• Toon, L. T.
• Zubair, Z.
• Patil, R.
• Roberts, P. R.
• Hudson, J.
• Elrefai, M.
• Bates, A.

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Subcutaneous Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) are now progressively administered as a day-case procedure. While existing data supports the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after transvenous ICD implantation, comparable evidence for S-ICDs is not well established. This study addresses this by presenting data from the most extensive population documented in the medical literature. We seek to evaluate the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after S-ICD implantation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge following S-ICD implantation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective analysis was conducted, encompassing data from all patients who underwent S-ICD implantation at our institution between January 2011 to April 2023 (n=240). The cohort was stratified into two groups: those discharged on the same day of the procedure (SD, n=124) and those subject to at least overnight hospital observation (OD, n=116). The medical records were reviewed during this period aiming to identify potential complications. Complications were categorized as device-related complications or inappropriate shock. Specific events, such as inappropriate shocks; lead revision; infection necessitating lead or generator extraction; pocket hematoma requiring drainage, blood transfusion, or prolongation of hospitalization; and other complications related to the lead or generator prompting medical or surgical intervention were documented. An inappropriate shock was defined as one delivered for any rhythm other than ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Among the 240 patients included in the study, 123 were scheduled for a day case procedure, while the remaining 117 underwent S-ICD implantation as in-patients. Notably, 112(91%) out of 123 planned-day patients and 12 in-patients (SD, total n=124) were successfully discharged on the same day. A substantial proportion (84%) of SD group had undergone the procedure for primary prevention. Patients with congenital heart disease were predominantly observed overnight.</jats:p><jats:p>Defibrillation testing (DFT) is routine in our practice to ensure S-ICD integrity and was conducted in all S-ICD patients unless contraindicated. The success rate of DFT among attempted patients was high, standing at 72% and 78% in the SD and OD groups, respectively.</jats:p><jats:p>The incidence of device-related complications was comparable between the two groups. The SD group displayed a slightly higher superficial infection rate but the incidence of inappropriate shocks was lower in the SD groups.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Based on our findings, same-day discharge following S-ICD implantation emerges as an appropriate practice. Our data strongly supports the assertion that same-day discharge in this context is safe and feasible, offering valuable insights into the optimal post-procedural management of S-ICD patients.Table 1ComplicationsTable 2Defibrillation Test</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics

• impedance spectroscopy
• extraction
• density functional theory
• size-exclusion chromatography