Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rayner, T. A.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Randomised control trial of a novel digital system to provide contextualised data feedback to augment physical activity behaviour change in a free-living environment as part of cardiac rehabilitationcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Eleuteri, A.
1 / 1 shared
Cranwell, E.
1 / 1 shared
Meenamkuzhy-Hariharan, P.
1 / 1 shared
Tew, K. F.
1 / 1 shared
Fisher, M.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Eleuteri, A.
  • Cranwell, E.
  • Meenamkuzhy-Hariharan, P.
  • Tew, K. F.
  • Fisher, M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Randomised control trial of a novel digital system to provide contextualised data feedback to augment physical activity behaviour change in a free-living environment as part of cardiac rehabilitation

  • Eleuteri, A.
  • Rayner, T. A.
  • Cranwell, E.
  • Meenamkuzhy-Hariharan, P.
  • Tew, K. F.
  • Fisher, M.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Physical activity (PA) is a core component of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and is crucial for enhancing cardiovascular (CV) fitness[1]. In the UK, CR programmes involve 1-2 hours of face-to-face contact per week over 6-8 weeks, implying that 98-99% of the intervention period is currently unmonitored and not optimised for potential positive lifestyle interventions. Consequently, CR staff are blind to PA that occurs outside of the clinical setting, which could be of too low or high intensity and/or duration, according to the Association of Certified Physiotherapists in Cardiac Rehabilitation (ACPICR) guidelines[2]. A previous pilot study showed a novel digital system to be feasible, acceptable and effective for CR patients[3], making it a promising intervention to assess in a randomised control trial (RCT).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>To conduct a RCT to examine whether contextualised data feedback delivered using a novel digital service, in conjunction with usual care (UC) promotes positive PA behavioural change, with direct comparison to UC alone.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This prospective, parallel group, open-label, RCT enrolled 130 patients eligible for CR and consisted of an 8-week intervention period with follow-up at 8-weeks. The intervention group received the novel digital CR service plus UC, with the control group receiving UC alone. The primary outcome was changes in PA to achieve the ACPICR guidelines. Both groups wore a PA monitor to collect minute-level energy expenditure data that underwent processing using a patented method to extract the specific PA metrics required for analysis. The secondary outcome was changes in CV fitness between pre and post assessments, measured using Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Adherence to data collection was good, with an average of 37 complete days (≥768 minutes per day) of PA data per person. Fifty-six intervention group patients and 49 control group patients were analysed for the primary outcome. A significant difference (p&amp;lt;0.025) in the probability of achieving the ACPICR ‘Daily Activity’ guideline was found between groups, with the intervention group more likely to achieve the guideline at week-8 versus control. Despite Covid-19 challenges, pre and post ISWT measurements were obtained for 33 intervention group patients and 37 control group patients. No significant differences between groups were found. However, the average improvement seen in the intervention group, +89 metres (m), exceeded the minimum clinically important difference for the ISWT (+70 m), and was more than double that seen in the control group, +44 m.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>This RCT builds on previous evidence supporting the use of the novel digital service in CR[3]. Engagement with, and completion of, the digital CR service was excellent. Participation was associated with statistically significant improved PA in relation to ACPICR guidelines and clinically important increases in CV fitness versus UC alone.Table 1</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • size-exclusion chromatography