Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Welzel, C.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 9
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Autologous or bovine pericardium for aortic cusp replacement? Histomorphological and biomechanical properties as decision making toolscitations
  • 2021Haemocompatibility testing allows selective adaption of GA-free SULEEI-preparation strategy for bovine pericardium1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tugtekin, S. M.
2 / 2 shared
Dittfeld, Claudia
2 / 2 shared
Matschke, K.
2 / 2 shared
Alexiou, K.
1 / 1 shared
Baehring, S.
1 / 1 shared
Jannasch, A.
2 / 2 shared
Maitz, M.
1 / 1 shared
Koenig, U.
1 / 1 shared
Sperling, C.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tugtekin, S. M.
  • Dittfeld, Claudia
  • Matschke, K.
  • Alexiou, K.
  • Baehring, S.
  • Jannasch, A.
  • Maitz, M.
  • Koenig, U.
  • Sperling, C.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Autologous or bovine pericardium for aortic cusp replacement? Histomorphological and biomechanical properties as decision making tools

  • Tugtekin, S. M.
  • Dittfeld, Claudia
  • Matschke, K.
  • Alexiou, K.
  • Baehring, S.
  • Welzel, C.
  • Jannasch, A.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background/Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Aortic valve cusp replacement using autologous pericardium is a promising technique. Expected advantages are reduced immune response, proper biomechanics and lower treatment expenses. During surgery decision for preferred pericardium segment is based on visual criteria. Autologous pericardium can be affected by patient's condition and age. Bovine pericardium, also the basic material for aortic valve prostheses, is easy available and carefully pre-examined. In this study, the homogeneity of tissue thickness, elastic modulus, vessel density and ECM components of GA-treated residual pericardia after surgery is compared with bovine pericardia equivalently treated.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>Aim of the study is the comparison of homogeneity of remaining autologous pericardium after surgical aortic valve replacement with bovine pericardia to evaluate and classify the individual applicability.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Up to 12 samples of human (n=7) or bovine (n=3) pericardia were analysed. Tissues were treated with 0.6% glutaraldehyde according to surgical protocol. Picrosiriusred- and HE-staining were performed (three edges per separated leaflet). Vessel or collagen content was determined with Zen Blue resp. Fiji software (colour deconvolution plugin, user threshold values). Sample thickness was measured via thickness gauge FD50 before uniaxial tensile testing. Hydroxyproline content was determined and related to dry weight. T-Test or ANOVA were used to test inter-species or intra-individual differences, respectively.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Human pericardia contain with 64.66±3.85% less collagenous fibres compared to bovine pericardia (86.01±1.713%); their vessel density is with 29.46±3.73 mm–2 significantly higher than in bovine samples (12.34±1.636 mm–2). In addition, human pericardia are with 367.7±59.2 μm significantly thinner than bovine (524.4±96.8 μm). Tensile testing (human: 36.00±15.17 MPa; bovine: 41.30±7.767 MPa) also revealed significant differences. With 77.80±11.76 mg/g merely a trend was observed for a lower hydroxyproline content in human samples (bovine 93.16±5.130 mg/g). ANOVA analyses of human pericardia illustrate significant differences for all properties, thus thickness, elastic modulus and hydroxyproline and collagen content between the individual human pericardium samples. In contrast, bovine pericardia showed an intra-individual difference only for the parameter of tissue thickness.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Human and bovine pericardia differ in histological and biomechanical parameters. In contrast to bovine pericardia, individual human pericardia were significantly different in most parameters investigated, leading to the conclusion that autologous materials are critically more heterogeneous than xenogeneic tissues. Vessel density in human pericardium was twofold higher than in bovine pericardia and can result in a higher risk for calcification.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Funding Acknowledgement</jats:title><jats:p>Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): TU Dresden</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • size-exclusion chromatography