Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sowa, Piotr

  • Google
  • 6
  • 58
  • 51

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2022Clinical and MRI measures to identify non-acute MOG-antibody disease in adults22citations
  • 2020Self-diffusion in a triple-defect A-B binary system : Monte Carlo simulation7citations
  • 2017Atomistic origin of the thermodynamic activation energy for self-diffusion and order-order relaxation in intermetallic compounds II : Monte Carlo simulation of B2-ordering binaries1citations
  • 2017Atomistic origin of the thermodynamic activation energy for self-diffusion and order-order relaxation in intermetallic compounds I : analytical approach3citations
  • 2014SiC (0001) and (000$bar{1}$) surfaces diffusion parameters estimated by means of atomistic Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations6citations
  • 2013Self-diffusion and ‘order-order’ kinetics in B2-ordering AB binary systems with a tendency for triple-defect formation : Monte Carlo simulation12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Murch, G. E.
3 / 7 shared
Betlej, Jan
1 / 1 shared
Abdank-Kozubski, Rafał
5 / 18 shared
Belova, I. V.
3 / 6 shared
Kozłowski, Mirosław
3 / 19 shared
Biborski, A.
2 / 3 shared
Biborski, Andrzej
2 / 4 shared
Evteev, Alexander V.
1 / 3 shared
Pierron-Bohnes, V.
1 / 5 shared
Murch, Graeme E.
1 / 6 shared
Levchenko, Elena V.
1 / 3 shared
Belova, Irina V.
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2020
2017
2014
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Murch, G. E.
  • Betlej, Jan
  • Abdank-Kozubski, Rafał
  • Belova, I. V.
  • Kozłowski, Mirosław
  • Biborski, A.
  • Biborski, Andrzej
  • Evteev, Alexander V.
  • Pierron-Bohnes, V.
  • Murch, Graeme E.
  • Levchenko, Elena V.
  • Belova, Irina V.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Clinical and MRI measures to identify non-acute MOG-antibody disease in adults

  • Rocca, Maria A.
  • Sowa, Piotr
  • Sormani, Maria Pia
  • Liu, Yaou
  • Durand-Dubief, Françoise
  • Bellenberg, Barbara
  • Wuerfel, Jens
  • Pröbstel, Anne-Katrin
  • Gasperini, Claudio
  • Stefano, Nicola De
  • Callegaro, Dagoberto
  • Messina, Silvia
  • Group, For The Magnims Study
  • Ruggieri, Serena
  • Jacob, Anu
  • Ulivelli, Monica
  • Cacciaguerra, Laura
  • Bianchi, Alessia
  • Battaglini, Marco
  • Schneider, Ruth
  • Llufriu, Sara
  • Carmisciano, Luca
  • Cortese, Rosa
  • Filippi, Massimo
  • Rovira, Alex
  • Arrambide, Georgina
  • Marignier, Romain
  • Lukas, Carsten
  • Barkhof, Frederik
  • Duan, Yunyun
  • Rimkus, Carolina De Medeiros
  • Paul, Friedemann
  • Tortorella, Carla
  • Ciccarelli, Olga
  • Celius, Elisabeth G.
  • Palace, Jacqueline
  • Grothe, Matthias
  • Amato, Maria Pia
  • Yaldizli, Özgür
  • Haider, Lukas
  • Groppa, Sergiu
  • Prados Carrasco, Ferran
  • Bodini, Benedetta
  • Sepulveda, Maria
  • Sastre Garriga, Jaume
  • Stankoff, Bruno
  • Müller, Jannis
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>MRI and clinical features of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody disease may overlap with those of other inflammatory demyelinating conditions posing diagnostic challenges, especially in non-acute phases and when serologic testing for MOG-antibodies is unavailable or shows uncertain results.</jats:p><jats:p>We aimed to identify MRI and clinical markers that differentiate non-acute MOG-antibody disease from aquaporin4 (AQP4)-antibody neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, guiding in the identification of MOG-antibody disease patients in clinical practice.</jats:p><jats:p>In this cross-sectional retrospective study, data from 16 MAGNIMS centres were included. Data collection and analyses were conducted from 2019 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of MOG-antibody disease, AQP4-neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis, brain and cord MRI at least 6 months from relapse, EDSS on the day of MRI. Brain white matter T2 lesions, T1-hypointense lesions, cortical and cord lesions were identified. Random-forest models were constructed to classify patients as MOG-antibody disease/AQP4-neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder/multiple sclerosis; a leave one out cross-validation procedure assessed the performance of the models. Based on the best discriminators between diseases, we proposed a guide to target investigations for MOG-antibody disease.</jats:p><jats:p>One hundred sixty-two patients with MOG-antibody disease (99F, mean age: 41 [±14] years, median EDSS: 2 [0-7.5]), 162 with AQP4-neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (132F, mean age: 51 [±14] years, median EDSS: 3.5 [0-8]), 189 with multiple sclerosis (132F, mean age: 40 [±10] years, median EDSS: 2 [0-8]) and 152 healthy controls (91F) were studied. In young patients (&amp;lt;34 years), with low disability (EDSS &amp;lt; 3), the absence of Dawson’s fingers, temporal lobe lesions and longitudinally extensive lesions in the cervical cord pointed towards a diagnosis of MOG-antibody disease instead of the other two diseases (accuracy: 76%, sensitivity: 81%, specificity: 84%, p &amp;lt; 0.001). In these non-acute patients, a number of brain lesions &amp;lt; 6 predicted MOG-antibody disease versus multiple sclerosis (accuracy: 83%, sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 83%, p &amp;lt; 0.001). An EDSS &amp;lt; 3 and the absence of longitudinally extensive lesions in the cervical cord predicted MOG-antibody disease versus AQP4-neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (accuracy: 76%, sensitivity: 89%, specificity: 62%, p &amp;lt; 0.001). A workflow with sequential tests and supporting features has been proposed to guide a better identification of MOG-antibody disease patients.</jats:p><jats:p>Adult non-acute MOG-antibody disease patients showed distinctive clinical and MRI features when compared to AQP4-neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis. A careful inspection of the morphology of brain and cord lesions together with clinical information, can guide for further analyses towards diagnosis of MOG-antibody disease in clinical practice.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • inclusion
  • phase
  • random
  • Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy