Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Goodwin, Carley

  • Google
  • 1
  • 11
  • 33

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Benchmarking of Nondestructive Testing for Additive Manufacturing33citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rodrigues, Tiago A.
1 / 20 shared
Miranda, R. M.
1 / 58 shared
Machado, Miguel A.
1 / 11 shared
Santos, Telmo G.
1 / 62 shared
Duarte, Valdemar R.
1 / 24 shared
Huber, Daniel E.
1 / 1 shared
Oliveira, João Pedro
1 / 98 shared
Silva, Carlos M. A.
1 / 9 shared
Pombinha, Pedro
1 / 2 shared
Pragana, João P. M.
1 / 3 shared
Coutinho, Luísa
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rodrigues, Tiago A.
  • Miranda, R. M.
  • Machado, Miguel A.
  • Santos, Telmo G.
  • Duarte, Valdemar R.
  • Huber, Daniel E.
  • Oliveira, João Pedro
  • Silva, Carlos M. A.
  • Pombinha, Pedro
  • Pragana, João P. M.
  • Coutinho, Luísa
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Benchmarking of Nondestructive Testing for Additive Manufacturing

  • Rodrigues, Tiago A.
  • Miranda, R. M.
  • Machado, Miguel A.
  • Santos, Telmo G.
  • Goodwin, Carley
  • Duarte, Valdemar R.
  • Huber, Daniel E.
  • Oliveira, João Pedro
  • Silva, Carlos M. A.
  • Pombinha, Pedro
  • Pragana, João P. M.
  • Coutinho, Luísa
Abstract

<p>Defect detection in additive manufacturing (AM) is of paramount importance to improve the reliability of products. Nondestructive testing is not yet widely used for defect detection. The main challenges are a lack of standards and methods, the types and location of defects, and the complex geometry of many parts. During selective laser melting (SLM), several types of defects can occur such as porosity, cracking, and lack of fusion. In this study, several nondestructive tests were conducted in a highly complex shaped part in AISI 316L stainless steel with real defects manufactured by SLM. Two additional artificial defects (one horizontal and one flat bottom hole) were produced and the defect detectability was evaluated. The techniques used were as follows: dye penetrant, infrared thermography, immersion ultrasonic, eddy current, and X-ray microcomputed tomography to assess different types of defects in the as-built part. We conclude that no single technique can detect every type of defect, although multiple techniques provide complementary and redundant information to critically evaluate the integrity of the parts. This approach is fundamental for improving the reliability of defect detection, which will help expand the potential for using AM to produce parts for critical structural applications. </p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • stainless steel
  • tomography
  • selective laser melting
  • defect
  • ultrasonic
  • porosity
  • thermography