People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Duarte, Valdemar R.
Universidade Nova de Lisboa
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (24/24 displayed)
- 2024High-performance Ni-based superalloy 718 fabricated via arc plasma directed energy deposition ; effect of post-deposition heat treatments on microstructure and mechanical propertiescitations
- 2024High-strength low-alloy steel fabricated by in situ interlayer hot forging arc-based directed energy deposition assisted with direct cooling ; Microstructural and mechanical properties evaluationcitations
- 2024High-performance Ni-based superalloy 718 fabricated via arc plasma directed energy depositioncitations
- 2024Enhancing manufacturing and post-processing properties of WAAM ER110 HSLA steel ; in situ hot forging + post-deposited heat treatment effects on surface quality and specific cutting energycitations
- 2023In situ interlayer hot forging arc-based directed energy deposition of Inconel® 625citations
- 2023In situ interlayer hot forging arc plasma directed energy deposition of Inconel® 625citations
- 2023In situ interlayer hot forging arc-based directed energy deposition of Inconel® 625 ; process development and microstructure effectscitations
- 2023In situ interlayer hot forging arc-based directed energy deposition of Inconel® 625: process development and microstructure effectscitations
- 2023In situ interlayer hot forging arc plasma directed energy deposition of Inconel® 625: microstructure evolution during heat treatmentscitations
- 2023In situ interlayer hot forging arc plasma directed energy deposition of Inconel® 625 ; microstructure evolution during heat treatmentscitations
- 2022In-situ hot forging direct energy deposition-arc of CuAl8 alloycitations
- 2022In-situ hot forging directed energy deposition-arc of CuAl8 alloycitations
- 2021Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing of High-Strength Low-Alloy Steelcitations
- 2021Benchmarking of Nondestructive Testing for Additive Manufacturingcitations
- 2021Effect of heat treatments on 316 stainless steel parts fabricated by wire and arc additive manufacturing : Microstructure and synchrotron X-ray diffraction analysiscitations
- 2021Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing of High‐Strength Low‐Alloy Steel: Microstructure and Mechanical Propertiescitations
- 2021Effect of heat treatments on 316 stainless steel parts fabricated by wire and arc additive manufacturing: Microstructure and synchrotron X-ray diffraction analysiscitations
- 2020In-situ strengthening of a high strength low alloy steel during Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM)citations
- 2020Influence of processing parameters on the density of 316L stainless steel parts manufactured through laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2020Hot forging wire and arc additive manufacturing (HF-WAAM)citations
- 2020Effect of milling parameters on HSLA steel parts produced by Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM)citations
- 2019Wire and arc additive manufacturing of HSLA steel: Effect of thermal cycles on microstructure and mechanical propertiescitations
- 2019Large-dimension metal parts produced through laser powder bed fusion
- 2019Current Status and Perspectives on Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM)citations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Benchmarking of Nondestructive Testing for Additive Manufacturing
Abstract
<p>Defect detection in additive manufacturing (AM) is of paramount importance to improve the reliability of products. Nondestructive testing is not yet widely used for defect detection. The main challenges are a lack of standards and methods, the types and location of defects, and the complex geometry of many parts. During selective laser melting (SLM), several types of defects can occur such as porosity, cracking, and lack of fusion. In this study, several nondestructive tests were conducted in a highly complex shaped part in AISI 316L stainless steel with real defects manufactured by SLM. Two additional artificial defects (one horizontal and one flat bottom hole) were produced and the defect detectability was evaluated. The techniques used were as follows: dye penetrant, infrared thermography, immersion ultrasonic, eddy current, and X-ray microcomputed tomography to assess different types of defects in the as-built part. We conclude that no single technique can detect every type of defect, although multiple techniques provide complementary and redundant information to critically evaluate the integrity of the parts. This approach is fundamental for improving the reliability of defect detection, which will help expand the potential for using AM to produce parts for critical structural applications. </p>