Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Smith, Dawn Alison

  • Google
  • 3
  • 6
  • 167

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2019Influence of rice husk and wood biomass properties on the manufacture of filaments for fused deposition modeling70citations
  • 2018Biopolymer alternatives in pellet form for 3D printing by extrusion19citations
  • 2016Green route to modification of wood waste, cellulose and hemicellulose using reactive extrusion78citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Barakat, Abdellatif
1 / 15 shared
Mayer-Laigle, Claire
1 / 16 shared
Theobald, Beatrix
1 / 2 shared
Singameni, Sarat
1 / 1 shared
Warnakula, Anthony
1 / 1 shared
Gaugler, Marc
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2018
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Barakat, Abdellatif
  • Mayer-Laigle, Claire
  • Theobald, Beatrix
  • Singameni, Sarat
  • Warnakula, Anthony
  • Gaugler, Marc
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Biopolymer alternatives in pellet form for 3D printing by extrusion

  • Smith, Dawn Alison
  • Singameni, Sarat
  • Warnakula, Anthony
Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is based on extrusion printing and is one of the most widely used addive manufacturing techniques. Though capable of challenging its traditional counterpart, injection molding in specific cases, the current application of FDM is limited due to fewer material options and the need to have the raw material in the filament form often. Considering the significant role that the process is projected to play in widely varying fields of applications, the current research considers to evaluate certain biopolymer alternatives in pellet forms for extrusion three-dimensional (3D) printing. A variety of material alternatives are evaluated and three specific systems, ECOVIO F C2311, several grades of INGEO, and the wood-polymer composite NN41, were identified to be the most promising candidates in the forms tested for extrusion 3D printing with varying degrees of commercial viabilities.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • extrusion
  • composite
  • wood
  • injection molding