Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Johnson, Nevan Nicholas

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Investigation on the effect of grinding wheel for grinding of AISI D3 tool steel under different conditions2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ali, Syed Mansoor
1 / 2 shared
Sahu, Jambeswar
1 / 1 shared
Anand, Suya Prem
1 / 2 shared
Srivas, C. S.
1 / 1 shared
Madhavadas, Vaishnav
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ali, Syed Mansoor
  • Sahu, Jambeswar
  • Anand, Suya Prem
  • Srivas, C. S.
  • Madhavadas, Vaishnav
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Investigation on the effect of grinding wheel for grinding of AISI D3 tool steel under different conditions

  • Johnson, Nevan Nicholas
  • Ali, Syed Mansoor
  • Sahu, Jambeswar
  • Anand, Suya Prem
  • Srivas, C. S.
  • Madhavadas, Vaishnav
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The surface finish of ground samples is highly influenced by the grinding parameters, grinding conditions and the type of grinding wheel. This paper emphasizes on the effect of various grinding factors such as the grinding conditions, the type of grinding wheel and operating process parameters like depth of cut and table speed on the surface roughness of the ground samples. Two types of grinding wheels alumina (Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>) and cubic boron nitride (CBN) were used for grinding AISI D3 tool steel under dry and wet conditions. The material removal rate and surface roughness were evaluated for all the ground samples. The results showed that wet grinding outperformed dry grinding and provided a better surface finish while using both grinding wheels. Machine Learning was implemented to optimize the grinding parameters. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithm was done and a Pareto frontier chart was made to help determine what values for the input parameters would achieve the required outputs such as material removal rate and surface roughness. Two different approaches Genetic Algorithm and Principle Component Analysis were then compared for multi-objective optimization. The type of grinding wheel used had a dominant effect on the surface roughness of ground samples while the depth of cut had a lesser effect.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • nitride
  • tool steel
  • Boron
  • machine learning
  • wet grinding