Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nabawy, Mostafa

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 12

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Long-term power degradation testing of piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters for low-frequency applications12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hirst, Jacob
1 / 1 shared
Wang, Jie
1 / 10 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hirst, Jacob
  • Wang, Jie
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Long-term power degradation testing of piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters for low-frequency applications

  • Nabawy, Mostafa
  • Hirst, Jacob
  • Wang, Jie
Abstract

Piezoelectric energy harvesters represent a viable and well-proven solution to convert ambient vibrations into useful electric power within a number of modern life applications. Whilst a large amount of studies has focused on improving power output from these devices, relatively little research has been directed to investigate how these devices degrade over time and the effect this has on long-term power generation. This paper, therefore, aims to experimentally investigate how piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters degrade during long-term operation in realistic harvesting conditions. The harvesters tested are unimorph cantilevers based on three of the most commonly used piezoelectric options: polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), Macro Fiber Composite (MFC), and Quick Pack (QP). Testing was carried out under single-frequency excitation (10–40 Hz) of 1g amplitude for three million vibration cycles. Our results show that the natural frequency and the optimum load resistance of the harvesters may vary during prolonged operation. Importantly, a larger cumulative variation in natural frequency and optimum load resistance yields a larger variation in power output, thereby linking the variation in power to the variation of the mechanical and/or electrical properties of the harvesters. Comparing the average power values over the testing period we found that increasing the tip mass does not necessarily improve the average power output, suggesting that a larger tip mass may exacerbate the degradation of the mechanical and/or electrical properties of the harvester. This was particularly evident for the stiffest QP harvesters which showed the highest signs of power degradation; nevertheless, QP harvesters still managed to demonstrate the highest power density values. When cost consideration is taken into account in the assessment, PVDF harvesters managed to demonstrate the highest power density to cost ratio.

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • composite