Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ahmed, Mohammad Hassan

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Comparative study of electrogas and shielded metal arc welding processes on steel A537 welded joints1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Abdel-Aleem, Hamed Ahmed
1 / 1 shared
Abbass, Mahmoud Ibrahim
1 / 1 shared
Ahmed, Essam
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Abdel-Aleem, Hamed Ahmed
  • Abbass, Mahmoud Ibrahim
  • Ahmed, Essam
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparative study of electrogas and shielded metal arc welding processes on steel A537 welded joints

  • Ahmed, Mohammad Hassan
  • Abdel-Aleem, Hamed Ahmed
  • Abbass, Mahmoud Ibrahim
  • Ahmed, Essam
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In this research, the electro-gas welding process (EGW) was compared with a shielded metal arc welding process (SMAW) from a mechanical properties point of view. Visual and radiographic inspections confirmed the soundness of weldments produced by both EGW and SMAW techniques. Various assessments, including hardness, tensile strength, V-notch impact toughness, macrostructure, microstructure, and electrochemical tests, were performed. The mechanical properties of the two welding processes were closely matched, with an average tensile strength of 590 MPa for EGW and 585 MPa for SMAW. The impact of welding variables, such as groove design and heat input, on the quality, mechanical properties, and electrochemical behavior of the welded joints was thoroughly examined. Dilution estimates, particularly for the EGW process, were around 35%, and a significant similarity was observed between the chemical composition determined through dilution calculations and that obtained from chemical analysis using an arc spark emission spectrometer. Notably, the EGW process demonstrated exceptional productivity, surpassing the SMAW process by more than 11 times. The optimal welding parameters for the EGW process were identified to achieve superior mechanical properties, low corrosion rates, and reduced consumption of the welding electrodes. This included adopting a single V type and groove angle of 300 instead of 600, resulting in a 23% reduction in economic costs. Selecting an appropriate heat input within the range of 12 to 14 kJ/mm further contributed to enhancing overall welding efficiency.&amp;#xD;</jats:p>

Topics
  • microstructure
  • corrosion
  • strength
  • steel
  • hardness
  • chemical composition
  • tensile strength