Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Visser, Claas Willem

  • Google
  • 2
  • 13
  • 382

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of Suspended Soft Bodies via Hydraulic Force Spectroscopy7citations
  • 2017Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting375citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Gnanachandran, Kajangi
1 / 1 shared
Akca, Imran B.
1 / 3 shared
Lekka, Malgorzata
1 / 1 shared
Berardi, Massimiliano
1 / 1 shared
Jang, Jieke
1 / 1 shared
Bielawski, Kevin
1 / 1 shared
Levato, Riccardo
1 / 13 shared
Hennink, Wim E.
1 / 18 shared
Blokzijl, Maarten Michiel
1 / 1 shared
Ribeiro, Alexandre
1 / 1 shared
Malda, Jos
1 / 39 shared
Castilho, Miguel
1 / 19 shared
Vermonden, Tina
1 / 14 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Gnanachandran, Kajangi
  • Akca, Imran B.
  • Lekka, Malgorzata
  • Berardi, Massimiliano
  • Jang, Jieke
  • Bielawski, Kevin
  • Levato, Riccardo
  • Hennink, Wim E.
  • Blokzijl, Maarten Michiel
  • Ribeiro, Alexandre
  • Malda, Jos
  • Castilho, Miguel
  • Vermonden, Tina
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting

  • Levato, Riccardo
  • Hennink, Wim E.
  • Visser, Claas Willem
  • Blokzijl, Maarten Michiel
  • Ribeiro, Alexandre
  • Malda, Jos
  • Castilho, Miguel
  • Vermonden, Tina
Abstract

<p>During extrusion-based bioprinting, the deposited bioink filaments are subjected to deformations, such as collapse of overhanging filaments, which compromises the ability to stack several layers of bioink, and fusion between adjacent filaments, which compromises the resolution and maintenance of a desired pore structure. When developing new bioinks, approaches to assess their shape fidelity after printing would be beneficial to evaluate the degree of deformation of the deposited filament and to estimate how similar the final printed construct would be to the design. However, shape fidelity has been prevalently assessed qualitatively through visual inspection after printing, hampering the direct comparison of the printability of different bioinks. In this technical note, we propose a quantitative evaluation for shape fidelity of bioinks based on testing the filament collapse on overhanging structures and the filament fusion of parallel printed strands. Both tests were applied on a hydrogel platform based on poloxamer 407 and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) blends, providing a library of hydrogels with different yield stresses. The presented approach is an easy way to assess bioink shape fidelity, applicable to any filament-based bioprinting system and able to quantitatively evaluate this aspect of printability , based on the degree of deformation of the printed filament. In addition, we built a simple theoretical model that relates filament collapse with bioink yield stress. The results of both shape fidelity tests underline the role of yield stress as one of the parameters influencing the printability of a bioink. The presented quantitative evaluation will allow for reproducible comparisons between different bioink platforms.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • pore
  • extrusion