People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Castilho, Miguel
Eindhoven University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (19/19 displayed)
- 2024Covalent Grafting of Functionalized MEW Fibers to Silk Fibroin Hydrogels to Obtain Reinforced Tissue Engineered Constructscitations
- 2024Covalent Grafting of Functionalized MEW Fibers to Silk Fibroin Hydrogels to Obtain Reinforced Tissue Engineered Constructscitations
- 20243D Printed Magneto-Active Microfiber Scaffolds for Remote Stimulation and Guided Organization of 3D In Vitro Skeletal Muscle Modelscitations
- 20233D printed magneto-active microfiber scaffolds for remote stimulation of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle modelscitations
- 20233D Printed Magneto‐Active Microfiber Scaffolds for Remote Stimulation and Guided Organization of 3D In Vitro Skeletal Muscle Modelscitations
- 20233D printed and punched porous surfaces of a non-resorbable, biphasic implant for the repair of osteochondral lesions improves repair tissue adherence and ingrowth
- 2023Multi-leveled Nanosilicate Implants Can Facilitate Near-Perfect Bone Healingcitations
- 2023Composite Graded Melt Electrowritten Scaffolds for Regeneration of the Periodontal Ligament-to-Bone Interfacecitations
- 2021Combinatorial fluorapatite-based scaffolds substituted with strontium, magnesium and silicon ions for mending bone defectscitations
- 2020Anisotropic hygro-expansion in hydrogel fibers owing to uniting 3D electrowriting and supramolecular polymer assemblycitations
- 2020Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfacescitations
- 2020Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfacescitations
- 2020Long-Term in Vivo Performance of Low-Temperature 3D-Printed Bioceramics in an Equine Modelcitations
- 2020Stable and Antibacterial Magnesium-Graphene Nanocomposite-Based Implants for Bone Repaircitations
- 2020Stable and Antibacterial Magnesium-Graphene Nanocomposite-Based Implants for Bone Repaircitations
- 2019Bi-layered micro-fibre reinforced hydrogels for articular cartilage regenerationcitations
- 2018Out-of-plane 3D-printed microfibers improve the shear properties of hydrogel compositescitations
- 2018Out-of-Plane 3D-Printed Microfibers Improve the Shear Properties of Hydrogel Compositescitations
- 2017Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprintingcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting
Abstract
<p>During extrusion-based bioprinting, the deposited bioink filaments are subjected to deformations, such as collapse of overhanging filaments, which compromises the ability to stack several layers of bioink, and fusion between adjacent filaments, which compromises the resolution and maintenance of a desired pore structure. When developing new bioinks, approaches to assess their shape fidelity after printing would be beneficial to evaluate the degree of deformation of the deposited filament and to estimate how similar the final printed construct would be to the design. However, shape fidelity has been prevalently assessed qualitatively through visual inspection after printing, hampering the direct comparison of the printability of different bioinks. In this technical note, we propose a quantitative evaluation for shape fidelity of bioinks based on testing the filament collapse on overhanging structures and the filament fusion of parallel printed strands. Both tests were applied on a hydrogel platform based on poloxamer 407 and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) blends, providing a library of hydrogels with different yield stresses. The presented approach is an easy way to assess bioink shape fidelity, applicable to any filament-based bioprinting system and able to quantitatively evaluate this aspect of printability , based on the degree of deformation of the printed filament. In addition, we built a simple theoretical model that relates filament collapse with bioink yield stress. The results of both shape fidelity tests underline the role of yield stress as one of the parameters influencing the printability of a bioink. The presented quantitative evaluation will allow for reproducible comparisons between different bioink platforms.</p>