People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Rosemann, Paul
Leipzig University of Applied Sciences
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (27/27 displayed)
- 2022Microstructure‐dependent crevice corrosion damage of implant materials <scp>CoCr28Mo6</scp>, <scp>TiAl6V4</scp> and <scp>REX</scp> 734 under severe inflammatory conditionscitations
- 2022Material-property correlations for a high-alloy special steelcitations
- 2021Application limits and sensitisation behaviour of the manganese‐ and nitrogen‐alloyed austenitic stainless steel P2000 (X13CrMnMoN18‐14‐3)citations
- 2020Sensitization behaviour of the nitrogen alloyed austenitic stainless steel X8CrMnMoN18-19-2citations
- 2020Microstructure and surface investigations of TiAl6V4 and CoCr28Mo6 orthopaedic femoral stemscitations
- 2020Quantitative evaluation of global and local chromium contents with the EPR test on ferritic and martensitic stainless steelscitations
- 2020Improvement of the martensitic stainless steel X46Cr13 by Q&P heat treatmentcitations
- 2020KorroPad testing - applications from industry and researchcitations
- 2019Detection of sensitisation on aged lean duplex stainless steel with different electrochemical methodscitations
- 2019Correlative Microscopy – Color Etching vs. Electron Backscatter Diffraction: Application Potenials and Limitationscitations
- 2018Reversed austenite for enhancing ductility of martensitic stainless steelcitations
- 2018Age-hardening behaviour, microstructure and corrosion resistance of the copper alloyed stainless steel 1.4542citations
- 2018Age-hardening behaviour, microstructure and corrosion resistance of the copper alloyed stainless steel 1.4542
- 2018Visualization of material-related susceptibility to pitting corrosion with the “KorroPad” indicator test
- 2018Precipitation behavior and corrosion resistance of nickel-free, high-nitrogen austenitic stainless steels
- 2018Heat treatment and corrosion resistance of cutlery
- 2018Influence of the post-weld surface treatment on the corrosion resistance of the duplex stainless steel 1.4062
- 2018How to Detect Sensitivity on Aged Lean-Duplex Stainless Steel With Electrochemical Methods
- 2018SD effect in martensitic stainless steel under Q&P heat treatment condition
- 2018Influence of austenitizing and tempering on the corrosion behavior and sensitization of martensitic stainless steel X50CrMoV15citations
- 2017Reversed austenite for enhancing ductility of martensitic stainless steelcitations
- 2017Influence of the post-weld surface treatment on the corrosion resistance of the duplex stainless steel 1.4062citations
- 2017Influence of the post-weld surface treatment on the corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steel 1.4062
- 2016Influence of nitrogen on the corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steelscitations
- 2015Influence of solution annealing temperature and cooling medium on microstructure, hardness and corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steel X46Cr13citations
- 2014Examination of the influence of heat treatment on the corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steelscitations
- 2013Influence of microstructure and surface treatment on the corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steels 1.4116, 1.4034, and 1.4021citations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Quantitative evaluation of global and local chromium contents with the EPR test on ferritic and martensitic stainless steels
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The cause of localised corrosion phenomena in stainless steels is often related to the element chromium, which is essential for the formation and resistance of the passive layer. A lower than nominally stated content of chromium occurs when the element is highly concentrated and locally bound in chromium-rich phases or precipitates, mostly carbides, and thus locally or globally absent for passivation. The method of electrochemical potentiodynamic reactivation (EPR) is uniquely suited to demonstrate the effect of chromium depletion on the passivation. Here, the steel surface is initially active in sulfuric acid and passivation is achieved by external dynamic polarization. After passivation, the polarization direction is reversed and in chromium-depleted areas a reactivation takes place, which is detected by an increase in current. The detection limit for a reduced chromium content depends largely on the strength of the sulfuric acid used in the EPR test and the polarization speed. The relationship between the sulfuric acid concentration and the electrochemical parameters from the EPR test is shown here using the example of ferritic Fe-Cr alloys with graded Cr contents in the range of approx. 6 to 18 %. From the passivation and reactivation current densities of the EPR data, models for the detection of global and local chromium contents (detection limits) are derived. The developed models are applied to the martensitic stainless steel X20Cr13 in different heat treatment conditions and the influence on the distribution of chromium in the microstructure, which is responsible for the passivation and thus the corrosion resistance, is shown.</jats:p>