People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Rosemann, Paul
Leipzig University of Applied Sciences
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (27/27 displayed)
- 2022Microstructure‐dependent crevice corrosion damage of implant materials <scp>CoCr28Mo6</scp>, <scp>TiAl6V4</scp> and <scp>REX</scp> 734 under severe inflammatory conditionscitations
- 2022Material-property correlations for a high-alloy special steelcitations
- 2021Application limits and sensitisation behaviour of the manganese‐ and nitrogen‐alloyed austenitic stainless steel P2000 (X13CrMnMoN18‐14‐3)citations
- 2020Sensitization behaviour of the nitrogen alloyed austenitic stainless steel X8CrMnMoN18-19-2citations
- 2020Microstructure and surface investigations of TiAl6V4 and CoCr28Mo6 orthopaedic femoral stemscitations
- 2020Quantitative evaluation of global and local chromium contents with the EPR test on ferritic and martensitic stainless steelscitations
- 2020Improvement of the martensitic stainless steel X46Cr13 by Q&P heat treatmentcitations
- 2020KorroPad testing - applications from industry and researchcitations
- 2019Detection of sensitisation on aged lean duplex stainless steel with different electrochemical methodscitations
- 2019Correlative Microscopy – Color Etching vs. Electron Backscatter Diffraction: Application Potenials and Limitationscitations
- 2018Reversed austenite for enhancing ductility of martensitic stainless steelcitations
- 2018Age-hardening behaviour, microstructure and corrosion resistance of the copper alloyed stainless steel 1.4542citations
- 2018Age-hardening behaviour, microstructure and corrosion resistance of the copper alloyed stainless steel 1.4542
- 2018Visualization of material-related susceptibility to pitting corrosion with the “KorroPad” indicator test
- 2018Precipitation behavior and corrosion resistance of nickel-free, high-nitrogen austenitic stainless steels
- 2018Heat treatment and corrosion resistance of cutlery
- 2018Influence of the post-weld surface treatment on the corrosion resistance of the duplex stainless steel 1.4062
- 2018How to Detect Sensitivity on Aged Lean-Duplex Stainless Steel With Electrochemical Methods
- 2018SD effect in martensitic stainless steel under Q&P heat treatment condition
- 2018Influence of austenitizing and tempering on the corrosion behavior and sensitization of martensitic stainless steel X50CrMoV15citations
- 2017Reversed austenite for enhancing ductility of martensitic stainless steelcitations
- 2017Influence of the post-weld surface treatment on the corrosion resistance of the duplex stainless steel 1.4062citations
- 2017Influence of the post-weld surface treatment on the corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steel 1.4062
- 2016Influence of nitrogen on the corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steelscitations
- 2015Influence of solution annealing temperature and cooling medium on microstructure, hardness and corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steel X46Cr13citations
- 2014Examination of the influence of heat treatment on the corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steelscitations
- 2013Influence of microstructure and surface treatment on the corrosion resistance of martensitic stainless steels 1.4116, 1.4034, and 1.4021citations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Microstructure and surface investigations of TiAl6V4 and CoCr28Mo6 orthopaedic femoral stems
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Total hip arthroplasties (THA) achieve very good clinical results and show annually increasing numbers of implantation. Interactions of the bone with the implants surface are of major importance for a stabile fixation and longevity of the implant. Therefore, manufacturing of the material and the implants as well as their surface properties can have a decisive influence on the functionality of the implant. The aim of the present study is the investigation of two commercially available femur stems with analytical methods. One stem is made of a TiAl6V4 wrought alloy for cementless application and the other one is made of a CoCr28Mo6 cast alloy for cemented fixation. The change of the production-related microstructure within the implant, differences between surface and bulk properties and potential correlations between the production-related changes to predict failures are addressed. Longitudinal cross sections of tested stems were prepared metallographically, investigated using optical and scanning electron microscopy including EDS and EBSD and correlated with micro hardness depth profiles. Due to production and processing, a subsurface layer is formed in both alloys. The TiAl6V4 wrought alloy stem exhibits a homogenous recrystallization microstructure with fine grains of micrometre size. The subsurface layer of the stem is deformed in parts with embedded corundum particles within the depth of 10 µm. Corundum residues were detected on the entire stem surface and partially covered by the applied calcium phosphate spray coating. The CoCr28Mo6 cast alloy stem shows a dendritic microstructure with chromium- and molybdenum-rich interdendritic precipitations and a surface layer of smaller globular grains in the size of 50 µm to 200 µm. The face centred cubic (fcc) crystal structure was predominantly detected in the phase analysis. The brittle hexagonal close packed (hcp) phase was evident at the implants surface. Similar to the TiAl6V4 alloy stem, embedded residues of corundum particles were detected on the implant surface. This study shows different surface integrities for both stems in comparison to the base material. The observed residues from the manufacturing processes are generally well-embedded into the implant surface, however if released they could impair the functionality of the endoprosthesis as the particles might negatively affect the sterilization process or might reduce metal corrosion resistance.</jats:p>