Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Radcliff, Kyle

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020The Effect of Reinforcement Substrate Alloy Selection on Mechanical Properties of REBCO Coated Conductors4citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hahn, Seungyong
1 / 3 shared
Walsh, R. P.
1 / 1 shared
Larbalestier, D. C.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hahn, Seungyong
  • Walsh, R. P.
  • Larbalestier, D. C.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The Effect of Reinforcement Substrate Alloy Selection on Mechanical Properties of REBCO Coated Conductors

  • Hahn, Seungyong
  • Walsh, R. P.
  • Larbalestier, D. C.
  • Radcliff, Kyle
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Rare earth Barium Copper Oxide (REBCO) coated conductors are promising candidates for high field (&gt;25 T) user magnets. However, as the demand for higher fields increase, so does the potential to overstrain the conductors being used. Coated conductor substrates, such as 310s stainless steel and the super-alloy Hastelloy C276, serve as the backbone for mechanical strength in these conductors. Both substrate alloys share similar properties when optimally processed into strips prior to manufacturing of the REBCO coated conductor. We find that with subsequent REBCO manufacturing processes the strength of the substrate changes, the magnitude of which depends on whether Hastelloy C276 or 310s stainless steel is used. In this study, we investigate the stress-strain variability found in coated conductors and how the manufacturing process affects the mechanical properties. The manufacturing step of concern is the short time that the substrate is exposed to high temperature (700 to 800 C) during the REBCO deposition process. To better relate manufacturing processes and mechanical properties, we subjected bare substrates to different heat treatments at 700, 750, and 800 C for 15 minutes each. With post heat-treatment room-temperature tensile tests, we found that the 310s stainless steel substrate was sensitive to the variations of time and temperature, exhibiting yield strength reductions of 20 to 50 % depending on the heat treatment. By contrast, Hastelloy C276 did not weaken and initially showed strengthening effects with exposure to the lower temperature heat treatments. Coated conductor manufactures may prefer 310s stainless steel as their substrate due to cost and availability, however, moving to Hastelloy C276 will offer better mechanical robustness and reproducibility of mechanical properties within their coated conductor.</jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • stainless steel
  • strength
  • copper
  • yield strength
  • Barium