Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Abbas, Tariq O.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Trilayer composite scaffold for urethral reconstruction: in vitro evaluation of mechanical, biological, and angiogenic properties2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Zandi, Nooshin
1 / 3 shared
Yalcin, Huseyin Cagatay
1 / 1 shared
Parangusan, Hemalatha
1 / 12 shared
Zakrif, Lubna
1 / 1 shared
Pennisi, Cristian Pablo
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Zandi, Nooshin
  • Yalcin, Huseyin Cagatay
  • Parangusan, Hemalatha
  • Zakrif, Lubna
  • Pennisi, Cristian Pablo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Trilayer composite scaffold for urethral reconstruction: in vitro evaluation of mechanical, biological, and angiogenic properties

  • Abbas, Tariq O.
  • Zandi, Nooshin
  • Yalcin, Huseyin Cagatay
  • Parangusan, Hemalatha
  • Zakrif, Lubna
  • Pennisi, Cristian Pablo
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Regeneration of damaged urethral tissue remains a major challenge in the field of lower urinary tract reconstruction. To address this issue, various synthetic and natural biodegradable biomaterials are currently being explored for the fabrication of scaffolds that promote urethral regeneration and healing. In this study, we present an approach to fabricate a trilayer hybrid scaffold comprising a central layer of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) between two layers of chitosan. The chitosan/PLA/chitosan (CPC) scaffolds were fabricated by a sequential electrospinning process and their properties were evaluated for their suitability for urethral tissue engineering. The physical and biological properties of the CPC scaffolds were evaluated in comparison to electrospun PLA scaffolds and acellular dermis (Alloderm) as controls for a synthetic and a natural scaffold, respectively. Compared to the controls, the CPC scaffolds exhibited higher elastic modulus and ultimate tensile strength, while maintaining extensibility and suture retention strength appropriate for clinical use. The CPC scaffolds displayed significant hydrophilicity, which was associated with a higher water absorption capacity of the chitosan nanofibres. The degradation products of the CPC scaffolds did not exhibit cytotoxicity and promoted wound closure by fibroblasts in vitro. In addition, CPC scaffolds showed increased growth of smooth muscle cells, an essential component for functional regeneration of urethral tissue. Furthermore, in a chicken embryo-based assay, CPC scaffolds demonstrated significantly higher angiogenic potential, indicating their ability to promote vascularisation, a crucial aspect for successful urethral reconstruction. Overall, these results suggest that CPC hybrid scaffolds containing both natural and synthetic components offer significant advantages over conventional acellular or synthetic materials alone. CPC scaffolds show promise as potential candidates for further research into the reconstruction of the urethra in vivo.</jats:p>

Topics
  • strength
  • composite
  • tensile strength
  • biomaterials
  • electrospinning