Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Zandieh-Doulabi, B.

  • Google
  • 4
  • 16
  • 141

Acta les instituts techniques agricoles

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2019Enhanced osteogenic activity by MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts on chemically surface-modified poly(ϵ-caprolactone) 3D-printed scaffolds compared to RGD immobilized scaffolds37citations
  • 2017New liposomal doxorubicin nanoformulation for osteosarcoma63citations
  • 2017Mechanoresponsiveness of human adipose stem cells on nanocomposite and micro-hybrid composite3citations
  • 2017EphA2 targeted doxorubicin-nanoliposomes for osteosarcoma treatment38citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Visscher, D. O.
1 / 1 shared
Helder, M. N.
3 / 3 shared
Mohammadi, J.
1 / 1 shared
Klein-Nulend, Jenneke
2 / 6 shared
Zamani, Y.
1 / 1 shared
Amoabediny, G.
3 / 3 shared
Forouzanfar, T.
2 / 2 shared
Sheikhha, M. H.
1 / 1 shared
Naderinezhad, S.
2 / 2 shared
Haghiralsadat, F.
2 / 2 shared
Ghazanfari, S.
1 / 1 shared
Esterik, F. A. S. Van
1 / 1 shared
Semeins, C. M.
1 / 1 shared
Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
1 / 105 shared
Nazmi, K.
1 / 3 shared
Boer, J. P. De
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Visscher, D. O.
  • Helder, M. N.
  • Mohammadi, J.
  • Klein-Nulend, Jenneke
  • Zamani, Y.
  • Amoabediny, G.
  • Forouzanfar, T.
  • Sheikhha, M. H.
  • Naderinezhad, S.
  • Haghiralsadat, F.
  • Ghazanfari, S.
  • Esterik, F. A. S. Van
  • Semeins, C. M.
  • Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
  • Nazmi, K.
  • Boer, J. P. De
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Enhanced osteogenic activity by MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts on chemically surface-modified poly(ϵ-caprolactone) 3D-printed scaffolds compared to RGD immobilized scaffolds

  • Visscher, D. O.
  • Helder, M. N.
  • Zandieh-Doulabi, B.
  • Mohammadi, J.
  • Klein-Nulend, Jenneke
  • Zamani, Y.
  • Amoabediny, G.
Abstract

In bone tissue engineering, the intrinsic hydrophobicity and surface smoothness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds hamper cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation. This intrinsic hydrophobicity of poly(ϵ-caprolactone) can be overcome by surface modifications, such as surface chemical modification or immobilization of biologically active molecules on the surface. Moreover, surface chemical modification may alter surface smoothness. Whether surface chemical modification or immobilization of a biologically active molecule on the surface is more effective to enhance pre-osteoblast proliferation and differentiation is currently unknown. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the osteogenic response of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts to chemically surface-modified and RGD-immobilized 3D-printed poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds. Poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds were 3D-printed consisting of strands deposited layer by layer with alternating 0°/90° lay-down pattern. 3D-printed poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffolds were surface-modified by either chemical modification using 3 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 24 or 72 h, or by RGD-immobilization. Strands were visualized by scanning electron microscopy. MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts were seeded onto the scaffolds and cultured up to 14 d. The strands of the unmodified poly(ϵ-caprolactone) scaffold had a smooth surface. NaOH treatment changed the scaffold surface topography from smooth to a honeycomb-like surface pattern, while RGD immobilization did not alter the surface topography. MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast seeding efficiency was similar (44%-54%) on all scaffolds after 12 h. Cell proliferation increased from day 1 to day 14 in unmodified controls (1.9-fold), 24 h NaOH-treated scaffolds (3-fold), 72 h NaOH-treated scaffolds (2.2-fold), and RGD-immobilized scaffolds (4.5-fold). At day 14, increased collagenous matrix deposition was achieved only on 24 h NaOH-treated (1.8-fold) and RGD-immobilized (2.2-fold) scaffolds compared to unmodified controls. Moreover, 24 h, but not 72 h, NaOH-treated scaffolds, increased alkaline phosphatase activity by 5-fold, while the increase by RGD immobilization was only 2.5-fold. Only 24 h NaOH-treated scaffolds enhanced mineralization (2.0-fold) compared to unmodified controls. In conclusion, RGD immobilization (0.011 μg mg-1 scaffold) on the surface and 24 h NaOH treatment of the surface of 3D-printed PCL scaffold both enhance pre-osteoblast proliferation and matrix deposition while only 24 h NaOH treatment results in increased osteogenic activity, making it the treatment of choice to promote bone formation by osteogenic cells.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • Sodium