Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bugby, S. L.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Automatic detection of scintillation light splashes using conventional and deep learning methods2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Cosma, G.
1 / 1 shared
Jiang, Y.
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Cosma, G.
  • Jiang, Y.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Automatic detection of scintillation light splashes using conventional and deep learning methods

  • Bugby, S. L.
  • Cosma, G.
  • Jiang, Y.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Six methods for the automatic detection of scintillation light splashes in a portable gamma camera are compared. Each imaging frame might contain any number of light splashes (including none), and the location and size of each light splash must be identified. For real-time imaging, splashes must be identified and characterised quickly and with minimal processing overhead. The techniques are compared on their ability to accurately determine the number, position, and size of light splashes, and to reconstruct the deposited energy within each splash for a simulated data set with known ground-truths. The speed of each technique and the ease of implementation are also discussed.For accuracy in blob (light splash) localisation, a Laplacian of Gaussian approach was found to provide the most accurate estimation. However, its performance greatly relies on the appropriate tuning of preprocessing parameters prior to image analysis and the number of blobs in each frame. Deep learning approaches (Faster-RCNNs) performed significantly better than traditional algorithms in terms of predicting the size of each light splash, did not require image preprocessing and were also more stable over a range of frame occupancies.Moreover, the paper fine-tuned a VGG16 based Faster-RCNN model with the simulated data set for the scintillation light splash detection, called DeepSplashSpotter (DSS).</jats:p>

Topics