Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hamzah, A. E.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Fast and accurate Brillouin frequency shift extraction in Brillouin optical time domain reflectometry (BOTDR) distributed fiber sensor by using ensemble machine learning algorithm2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ibrahim, M. F.
1 / 2 shared
Arsad, N.
1 / 1 shared
Tanaka, Y.
1 / 9 shared
Almoosa, A. S. K.
1 / 1 shared
Zan, M. S. D.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ibrahim, M. F.
  • Arsad, N.
  • Tanaka, Y.
  • Almoosa, A. S. K.
  • Zan, M. S. D.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fast and accurate Brillouin frequency shift extraction in Brillouin optical time domain reflectometry (BOTDR) distributed fiber sensor by using ensemble machine learning algorithm

  • Hamzah, A. E.
  • Ibrahim, M. F.
  • Arsad, N.
  • Tanaka, Y.
  • Almoosa, A. S. K.
  • Zan, M. S. D.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>To improve the Brillouin frequency shift (BFS) resolution measurement and processing time of the differential cross-spectrum Brillouin optical time domain reflectometry (DCS-BOTDR) fiber sensor, our team suggests employing the ensemble machine learning (EML) technique. Because it gave the best BFS resolution compared to the other T<jats:sub>L</jats:sub> cases, we used the BFS distribution data recorded by the pulse duration T<jats:sub>L</jats:sub> =14 ns case as ground truth to train the EML model in this work. After that, we tested the EML model for T<jats:sub>L</jats:sub> =4, 60, and 90 ns cases. We improved the BFS resolution for all T<jats:sub>L</jats:sub> situations by approximately 2.85 MHz, comparable to our resolution when T<jats:sub>L</jats:sub> was equal to 14 ns. This result demonstrates that the EML algorithm is reliable, efficient, and highly accurate in its predictive capabilities. Additionally, we have documented a rapid processing time of approximately one second. In addition, we have successfully demonstrated 20 cm spatial resolution measurement for T<jats:sub>L</jats:sub> =60 and 90 ns, which was not previously possible with the usual DCS-BOTDR signal processing method.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • extraction
  • machine learning
  • reflectometry