Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gadallah, N.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 3
  • 18

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Implementation of hybrid RSM-GA optimization techniques in underwater friction stir welding6citations
  • 2020Optimization of friction stir welding parameters using response surface methodology12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
El-Zathry, N. E.
1 / 2 shared
Ghafaar, M. Abdel
1 / 2 shared
Abu-Okail, M.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • El-Zathry, N. E.
  • Ghafaar, M. Abdel
  • Abu-Okail, M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Implementation of hybrid RSM-GA optimization techniques in underwater friction stir welding

  • El-Zathry, N. E.
  • Gadallah, N.
  • Ghafaar, M. Abdel
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Standard friction stir welding process parameters have a considerable impact on the quality of functional parts produced by underwater friction stir welding (UWFSW) with additive water. Hybrid statistical techniques may be used to optimize operating parameters in order to improve the aim function. The tensile strength (UTS)of parts fabricated with UWFSW by Al 6063 material in accordance with ASTMD638-14 tests is investigated in this study. In the construction of test specimens, three parameters were varied: rotational speed from 1000 to 1800 rpm, travel speed from 4 to 10 mm/s, and shoulder diameter from 10 to 20 mm. The response surface methodology (RSM) based central composite design (CCD) matrix for the parametric combination was constructed using a second-order polynomial fitting model. The maximum UTS of testing samples on the 201T universal testing machine (UTM) was 208.27 MPa. These process parameters are also optimized using hybrid optimization approaches such as response surface methodology- genetic algorithm (RSM-GA). RSM-GA had the highest precision of 98.99 percent, which resulted in optimal characteristics such as rotating speed 1800 rpm, travelling speed 4 mm/s, and shoulder diameter 15 mm, which resulted in a maximum tensile strength of 199.0212 MPa.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • composite
  • tensile strength