People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Tukiainen, Antti
Tampere University
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (23/23 displayed)
- 2024Bridging the gap between surface physics and photonicscitations
- 2024Ti3+ Self-Doping-Mediated Optimization of TiO2 Photocatalyst Coating Grown by Atomic Layer Depositioncitations
- 2022Insights into Tailoring of Atomic Layer Deposition Grown TiO2 as Photoelectrode Coating
- 2022Luminescent (Er,Ho)2O3 thin films by ALD to enhance the performance of silicon solar cellscitations
- 2022Low-Temperature Route to Direct Amorphous to Rutile Crystallization of TiO2Thin Films Grown by Atomic Layer Depositioncitations
- 2022Tunable Ti3+-Mediated Charge Carrier Dynamics of Atomic Layer Deposition-Grown Amorphous TiO2citations
- 2021Comparison of the heat-treatment effect on carrier dynamics in TiO2 thin films deposited by different methodscitations
- 2021Luminescent (Er,Ho)2O3 thin films by ALD to enhance the performance of silicon solar cellscitations
- 2021Interface Engineering of TiO2 Photoelectrode Coatings Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition on Siliconcitations
- 2020Optimization of photogenerated charge carrier lifetimes in ald grown tio2 for photonic applicationscitations
- 2019Thermophotonic cooling in GaAs based light emitterscitations
- 2019Highly efficient charge separation in model Z-scheme TiO2/TiSi2/Si photoanode by micropatterned titanium silicide interlayercitations
- 2019Observation of local electroluminescent cooling and identifying the remaining challenges
- 2018Surface doping of GaxIn1−xAs semiconductor crystals with magnesiumcitations
- 2017Structured metal/polymer back reflectors for III-V solar cells
- 2016High-efficiency GaInP/GaAs/GaInNAs solar cells grown by combined MBE-MOCVD techniquecitations
- 2016Determination of composition and energy gaps of GaInNAsSb layers grown by MBEcitations
- 2016Optical Energy Transfer and Loss Mechanisms in Coupled Intracavity Light Emitterscitations
- 2016Combined MBE-MOCVD process for high-efficiency multijunction solar cells
- 2016High efficiency multijunction solar cells: Electrical and optical properties of the dilute nitride sub-junctions
- 2015Defects in dilute nitride solar cells
- 2015Dilute nitrides for boosting the efficiency of III-V multijunction solar cells
- 2004Effects of rapid thermal annealing on deep levels in n -GaInPcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Bridging the gap between surface physics and photonics
Abstract
Use and performance criteria of photonic devices increase in various application areas such as information and communication, lighting, and photovoltaics. In many current and future photonic devices, surfaces of a semiconductor crystal are a weak part causing significant photo-electric losses and malfunctions in applications. These surface challenges, many of which arise from material defects at semiconductor surfaces, include signal attenuation in waveguides, light absorption in light emitting diodes, non-radiative recombination of carriers in solar cells, leakage (dark) current of photodiodes, and light reflection at solar cell interfaces for instance. To reduce harmful surface effects, the optical and electrical passivation of devices has been developed for several decades, especially with the methods of semiconductor technology. Because atomic scale control and knowledge of surface-related phenomena have become relevant to increase the performance of different devices, it might be useful to enhance the bridging of surface physics to photonics. Toward that target, we review some evolving research subjects with open questions and possible solutions, which hopefully provide example connecting points between photonic device passivation and surface physics. One question is related to the properties of the wet chemically cleaned semiconductor surfaces which are typically utilized in device manufacturing processes, but which appear to be different from crystalline surfaces studied in ultrahigh vacuum by physicists. In devices, a defective semiconductor surface often lies at an embedded interface formed by a thin metal or insulator film grown on the semiconductor crystal, which makes the measurements of its atomic and electronic structures difficult. To understand these interface properties, it is essential to combine quantum mechanical simulation methods. This review also covers metal-semiconductor interfaces which are included in most photonic devices to transmit electric carriers to the semiconductor structure. Low-resistive and passivated contacts with an ultrathin tunneling barrier are an emergent solution to control electrical losses in photonic devices.