People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Vähänissi, Ville
Aalto University
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (43/43 displayed)
- 2024(invited talk) Sulfur-hyperdoped silicon by ultrashort laser processing
- 2024Contactless analysis of surface passivation and charge transfer at the TiO 2-Si interfacecitations
- 2024Contactless analysis of surface passivation and charge transfer at the TiO 2-Si interfacecitations
- 2024Impact of post-ion implantation annealing on Se-hyperdoped Gecitations
- 2024Impact of post-ion implantation annealing on Se-hyperdoped Gecitations
- 2024Bridging the gap between surface physics and photonicscitations
- 2024Contactless analysis of surface passivation and charge transfer at the TiO2-Si interfacecitations
- 2024(poster) ALD SiO2 provides efficient Ge surface passivation with a tailorable charge polarity
- 2024(poster) ALD SiO2 provides efficient Ge surface passivation with a tailorable charge polarity
- 2023Surface passivation of Germanium with ALD Al2O3: Impact of Composition and Crystallinity of GeOx Interlayercitations
- 2023(oral talk) Effective carrier lifetime in ultrashort pulse laser hyperdoped silicon: dopant concentration dependence and practical upper limits
- 2023Excellent Responsivity and Low Dark Current Obtained with Metal-Assisted Chemical Etched Si Photodiodecitations
- 2023Comparison of SiNx-based Surface Passivation Between Germanium and Siliconcitations
- 2023Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposited SiO2 enables positive thin film charge and surface recombination velocity of 1.3 cm/s on germaniumcitations
- 2023Chemical Excitation of Silicon Photoconductors by Metal-Assisted Chemical Etchingcitations
- 2023Chemical Excitation of Silicon Photoconductors by Metal-Assisted Chemical Etchingcitations
- 2023Status report on emerging photovoltaicscitations
- 2023Atomic Layer Deposition of Titanium Oxide-Based Films for Semiconductor Applications–Effects of Precursor and Operating Conditionscitations
- 2023Quantifying the Impact of Al Deposition Method on Underlying Al2O3/Si Interface Qualitycitations
- 2023Is Carrier Mobility a Limiting Factor for Charge Transfer in Tio2/Si Devices? A Study by Transient Reflectance Spectroscopycitations
- 2022Electron Injection in Metal Assisted Chemical Etching as a Fundamental Mechanism for Electroless Electricity Generationcitations
- 2022Electron Injection in Metal Assisted Chemical Etching as a Fundamental Mechanism for Electroless Electricity Generationcitations
- 2022Perspectives on Black Silicon in Semiconductor Manufacturing: Experimental Comparison of Plasma Etching, MACE and Fs-Laser Etchingcitations
- 2022Millisecond-Level Minority Carrier Lifetime in Femtosecond Laser-Textured Black Siliconcitations
- 2022(oral talk) Compatibility of Al-neal in processing of Si devices with Al2O3 layer
- 2021Efficient photon capture on germanium surfaces using industrially feasible nanostructure formationcitations
- 2021Al-neal Degrades Al2O3 Passivation of Silicon Surfacecitations
- 2020Modeling Field-effect in Black Silicon and its Impact on Device Performancecitations
- 2020Impact of doping and silicon substrate resistivity on the blistering of atomic-layer-deposited aluminium oxidecitations
- 2019Effect of MACE Parameters on Electrical and Optical Properties of ALD Passivated Black Siliconcitations
- 2019Compatibility of 3-D Printed Devices in Cleanroom Environments for Semiconductor Processingcitations
- 2019Compatibility of 3-D Printed Devices in Cleanroom Environments for Semiconductor Processingcitations
- 2019Passivation of Detector‐Grade FZ‐Si with ALD‐Grown Aluminium Oxidecitations
- 2018Elucidation of Iron Gettering Mechanisms in Boron-Implanted Silicon Solar Cellscitations
- 2018Rapid thermal anneal activates light induced degradation due to copper redistributioncitations
- 2017Electronic Quality Improvement of Highly Defective Quasi-Mono Silicon Material by Phosphorus Diffusion Getteringcitations
- 2017Toward Effective Gettering in Boron-Implanted Silicon Solar Cellscitations
- 2017Full recovery of red zone in p-type high-performance multicrystalline siliconcitations
- 2017Surface passivation of black silicon phosphorus emitters with atomic layer deposited SiO2/Al2O3 stackscitations
- 2016Finite- vs. infinite-source emitters in silicon photovoltaicscitations
- 2014Iron Precipitation upon Gettering in Phosphorus-Implanted Czochralski Silicon and its Impact on Solar Cell Performancecitations
- 2013Passivation of black silicon boron emitters with atomic layer deposited aluminum oxidecitations
- 2008Metallization of Polymer Substrates for Flexible Electronics
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Bridging the gap between surface physics and photonics
Abstract
Use and performance criteria of photonic devices increase in various application areas such as information and communication, lighting, and photovoltaics. In many current and future photonic devices, surfaces of a semiconductor crystal are a weak part causing significant photo-electric losses and malfunctions in applications. These surface challenges, many of which arise from material defects at semiconductor surfaces, include signal attenuation in waveguides, light absorption in light emitting diodes, non-radiative recombination of carriers in solar cells, leakage (dark) current of photodiodes, and light reflection at solar cell interfaces for instance. To reduce harmful surface effects, the optical and electrical passivation of devices has been developed for several decades, especially with the methods of semiconductor technology. Because atomic scale control and knowledge of surface-related phenomena have become relevant to increase the performance of different devices, it might be useful to enhance the bridging of surface physics to photonics. Toward that target, we review some evolving research subjects with open questions and possible solutions, which hopefully provide example connecting points between photonic device passivation and surface physics. One question is related to the properties of the wet chemically cleaned semiconductor surfaces which are typically utilized in device manufacturing processes, but which appear to be different from crystalline surfaces studied in ultrahigh vacuum by physicists. In devices, a defective semiconductor surface often lies at an embedded interface formed by a thin metal or insulator film grown on the semiconductor crystal, which makes the measurements of its atomic and electronic structures difficult. To understand these interface properties, it is essential to combine quantum mechanical simulation methods. This review also covers metal-semiconductor interfaces which are included in most photonic devices to transmit electric carriers to the semiconductor structure. Low-resistive and passivated contacts with an ultrathin tunneling barrier are an emergent solution to control electrical losses in photonic devices.