People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Isaksson, Hanna
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (17/17 displayed)
- 2024Impact of storage time prior to cryopreservation on mechanical properties of aortic homograftscitations
- 2022Crack propagation in articular cartilage under cyclic loading using cohesive finite element modelingcitations
- 2022Fracture behavior of a composite of bone and calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatitecitations
- 2022Fracture behavior of a composite of bone and calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatitecitations
- 2021Dual modality neutron and x-ray tomography for enhanced image analysis of the bone-metal interfacecitations
- 2021Dual modality neutron and x-ray tomography for enhanced image analysis of the bone-metal interfacecitations
- 2020Spatio-temporal evolution of hydroxyapatite crystal thickness at the bone-implant interfacecitations
- 2020Bone Damage Evolution Around Integrated Metal Screws Using X-Ray Tomographycitations
- 2020Comparison of small‐angle neutron and X‐ray scattering for studying cortical bone nanostructurecitations
- 2020The influence of microstructure on crack propagation in cortical bone at the mesoscalecitations
- 2019An interface damage model that captures crack propagation at the microscale in cortical bone using XFEMcitations
- 2019Crack propagation in cortical bone is affected by the characteristics of the cement line : a parameter study using an XFEM interface damage modelcitations
- 2019Fracture strength of the proximal femur injected with a calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite bone substitutecitations
- 2017Neutron tomographic imaging of bone-implant interfacecitations
- 2016Differences in acoustic impedance of fresh and embedded human trabecular bone samples - scanning acoustic microscopy and numerical evaluationcitations
- 2016Bone mineral crystal size and organization vary across mature rat bone cortexcitations
- 2016How accurately can subject-specific finite element models predict strains and strength of human femora? Investigation using full-field measurementscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Dual modality neutron and x-ray tomography for enhanced image analysis of the bone-metal interface
Abstract
<p>The bone tissue formed at the contact interface with metallic implants, particularly its 3D microstructure, plays a pivotal role for the structural integrity of implant fixation. X-ray tomography is the classical imaging technique used for accessing microstructural information from bone tissue. However, neutron tomography has shown promise for visualising the immediate bone-metal implant interface, something which is highly challenging with x-rays due to large differences in attenuation between metal and biological tissue causing image artefacts. To highlight and explore the complementary nature of neutron and x-ray tomography, proximal rat tibiae with titanium-based implants were imaged with both modalities. The two techniques were compared in terms of visualisation of different material phases and by comparing the properties of the individual images, such as the contrast-to-noise ratio. After superimposing the images using a dedicated image registration algorithm, the complementarity was further investigated via analysis of the dual modality histogram, joining the neutron and x-ray data. From these joint histograms, peaks with well-defined grey value intervals corresponding to the different material phases observed in the specimens were identified and compared. The results highlight differences in how neutrons and x-rays interact with biological tissues and metallic implants, as well as the benefits of combining both modalities. Future refinement of the joint histogram analysis could improve the segmentation of structures and tissues, and yield novel information about specimen-specific properties such as moisture content. </p>