Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Smielak, Beata

  • Google
  • 3
  • 6
  • 30

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023An Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of a Hybrid Composite Containing Hydroxyapatite9citations
  • 2023Preparation of an experimental dental composite with different Bis-GMA/UDMA proportions4citations
  • 2018Effect of air abrasion on the number of particles embedded in zironia17citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kula, Zofia
1 / 2 shared
Klimek, Leszek
2 / 11 shared
Kopacz, Karolina
2 / 8 shared
Bociong, Kinga
1 / 13 shared
Ciesielska, Sandra
1 / 1 shared
Krasowski, Michał
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kula, Zofia
  • Klimek, Leszek
  • Kopacz, Karolina
  • Bociong, Kinga
  • Ciesielska, Sandra
  • Krasowski, Michał
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Preparation of an experimental dental composite with different Bis-GMA/UDMA proportions

  • Bociong, Kinga
  • Ciesielska, Sandra
  • Krasowski, Michał
  • Smielak, Beata
  • Kopacz, Karolina
Abstract

Three types of matrix with constant amount of TEGDMA (30 wt.%), and Bis-EMA (10 wt.%) and variable values of Bis-GMA (10, 5, or 0 wt.%) and UDMA (50, 55, or 60 wt.%) were prepared. Composites were filled with 45 wt.% of silanized silica. Both matrices and composites were tested for flexural strength (FS), diametral tensile strength (DTS), hardness (HV) and polymerization shrinkage stress. There were no significant differences for the DTS test. All materials meet the FS requirements for type 2 dental composites. A significant decrease in HV was observed for matrix non-containing Bis-GMA. The highest value of shrinkage stress had material without Bis-GMA and it amounted 16,6 ± 1.0 MPa (filled) or 13.6 ± 0.8 MPa (unfilled). It was also shown that increasing the amount of UDMA while simultaneously reducing Bis-GMA in the studied materials increases polymerization shrinkage stress, which could be unfavorable for dental materials.

Topics
  • strength
  • composite
  • flexural strength
  • hardness
  • tensile strength