| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Jensen, Pernille Erland
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2024Oxidation of sulfides from secondary materials in cementitious binders as a function of environmental conditions
- 2024Electrodialytic extraction of copper, lead and zinc from sulfide mine tailings:Optimization of current density and operation time
- 2021Screening for key material parameters affecting early-age and mechanical properties of blended cementitious binders with mine tailingscitations
- 2019Evaluation of mine tailings’ potential as supplementary cementitious materials based on chemical, mineralogical and physical characteristicscitations
- 2017The influence of sediment properties and experimental variables on the efficiency of electrodialytic removal of metals from sedimentcitations
- 2016Degradation of oil products in a soil from a Russian Barents hot-spot during electrodialytic remediationcitations
- 2016Wood ash used as partly sand and/or cement replacement in mortarcitations
- 2016Replacement of 5% of OPC by fly ash and APC residues from MSWI with electrodialytic pre-treatment
- 2015Comparison of 2-compartment, 3-compartment and stack designs for electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from harbour sedimentscitations
- 2015Screening of variable importance for optimizing electrodialytic remediation of heavy metals from polluted harbour sedimentscitations
- 2015Multivariate methods for evaluating the efficiency of electrodialytic removal of heavy metals from polluted harbour sedimentscitations
- 2014Electrodialytically treated MSWI APC residue as substitute for cement in mortar
- 2013Effect of pulse current on acidification and removal of Cu, Cd, and As during suspended electrodialytic soil remediationcitations
- 2012Electrodialytic remediation of suspended soil – Comparison of two different soil fractionscitations
- 2007Electrodialytic extraction of Cd and Cu from sediment from Sisimiut Harbour, Greenlandcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Screening of variable importance for optimizing electrodialytic remediation of heavy metals from polluted harbour sediments
Abstract
Using multivariate design and modelling, the optimal conditions for electrodialytic remediation (EDR) of heavy metals were determined for polluted harbour sediments from Hammerfest harbour located in the geographic Arctic region of Norway. The comparative importance of the variables, current density, remediation time, light/no light, the liquid-solid ratio and stirring rate of the sediment suspension, was determined in 15 laboratory-scale EDR experiments by projection to latent structures (PLS). The relation between the X matrix (experimental variables) and the Y matrix (removal efficiencies) was computed and variable importance in the projection was used to assess the influence of the experimental variables. Current density and remediation time proved to have the highest influence on the remediation of the heavy metals Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in the studied experimental domain. In addition, it was shown that excluding the acidification time improved the PLS model, indicating the importance of applying a limited experimental domain that covers the removal phases of each heavy metal in the specific sediment. Based on PLS modelling, the optimal conditions for remediating the Hammerfest sediment were determined; operating in the experimental domain of 0.5-0.8 mA/cm2 and a remediation time after acidification of 450-570 h met acceptable levels according to Norwegian sediment quality guidelines.