Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Corney, Jonathan

  • Google
  • 13
  • 19
  • 220

University of Edinburgh

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2020Process selection methodology for near net shape manufacturing21citations
  • 2019A state of the art review of hydroforming technology119citations
  • 2018Design and validation of a fixture for positive incremental sheet forming15citations
  • 2018Enabling sheet hydroforming to produce smaller radii on aerospace nickel alloys8citations
  • 2018Realising the affective potential of patents18citations
  • 2017Correlation between von Mises strain and material thinning in a hydroformed sample of Ti35A aerospace grade titanium2citations
  • 2017A methodology for near net shape process feasibility assessment8citations
  • 2017A methodology for assessing the feasibility of producing components by flow forming13citations
  • 2016A methodology for assessing the feasibility of producing components by flow formingcitations
  • 2016Flow formingcitations
  • 2015Assessing the potential benefits of manufacturing gas turbine components by utilizing hydroforming technologycitations
  • 2015Systematic process selection for cold forgingcitations
  • 2015A review of flow forming processes and mechanisms16citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Marini, Daniele
7 / 7 shared
Savings, David
3 / 4 shared
Zuelli, Nicola
3 / 11 shared
Bell, Colin
4 / 6 shared
Bhattacharya, Rahul
1 / 3 shared
Sivaswamy, Giribaskar
1 / 15 shared
Amir, Muhammad
1 / 2 shared
Siddiqi, Muftooh Ur Rehman
1 / 3 shared
Jump, Ellen
2 / 2 shared
Blood, Bob
1 / 1 shared
Dixon, Caleb
1 / 1 shared
Maclachlan, Ross
1 / 1 shared
Vasantha, Gokula Vijayumar Annamalai
1 / 1 shared
Wodehouse, Andrew
1 / 3 shared
Jagadeesan, Ananda Prasanna
1 / 1 shared
Kerr, William
1 / 3 shared
Cunningham, David
4 / 5 shared
Xirouchakis, Paul
1 / 6 shared
Storr, John
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Marini, Daniele
  • Savings, David
  • Zuelli, Nicola
  • Bell, Colin
  • Bhattacharya, Rahul
  • Sivaswamy, Giribaskar
  • Amir, Muhammad
  • Siddiqi, Muftooh Ur Rehman
  • Jump, Ellen
  • Blood, Bob
  • Dixon, Caleb
  • Maclachlan, Ross
  • Vasantha, Gokula Vijayumar Annamalai
  • Wodehouse, Andrew
  • Jagadeesan, Ananda Prasanna
  • Kerr, William
  • Cunningham, David
  • Xirouchakis, Paul
  • Storr, John
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Realising the affective potential of patents

  • Corney, Jonathan
  • Maclachlan, Ross
  • Vasantha, Gokula Vijayumar Annamalai
  • Wodehouse, Andrew
  • Jagadeesan, Ananda Prasanna
Abstract

This research sets out a new interpretation of the patent database using affective design parameters. While this resource contains a vast quantity of technical information, its extraction and use in practical design settings is extremely challenging. Until now, all filing and subsequent landscaping or profiling of patents has been based on their technical characteristics. We set out an alternative approach that utilises crowdsourcing to first summarise patents and then applies text analysis tools to assess the summarising text in relation to three affective parameters: appearance, ease of use, and semantics. The results been used to create novel patent clusters that provide an alternative perspective on relevant technical data, and support user-centric engineering design. The workflow and tasks to effectively interface with the crowd are outlined, and the process for harvesting and processing responses using a combination of manual and computational analysis is reviewed. The process creates sets of descriptive words for each patent which differ significantly from those created using only functional requirements, and support a new paradigm for the use of big data in engineering design – one that utilises desirable affective qualities as the basis for scouring and presenting relevant functional patent information for concept generation and development.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • cluster
  • extraction