Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

André, Natália M.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 13

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Influence of the interlayer film thickness on the mechanical performance of AA2024-T3/CF-PPS hybrid joints produced by friction spot joining13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sergio, T. Amancio-Filho
1 / 61 shared
Canto, Leonardo B.
1 / 2 shared
Goushegir, Seyed M.
1 / 3 shared
Santos, Jorge F. Dos
1 / 18 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sergio, T. Amancio-Filho
  • Canto, Leonardo B.
  • Goushegir, Seyed M.
  • Santos, Jorge F. Dos
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of the interlayer film thickness on the mechanical performance of AA2024-T3/CF-PPS hybrid joints produced by friction spot joining

  • Sergio, T. Amancio-Filho
  • Canto, Leonardo B.
  • André, Natália M.
  • Goushegir, Seyed M.
  • Santos, Jorge F. Dos
Abstract

<p>Friction Spot Joining (FSpJ) is an innovative friction-based joining technique for metal-polymer hybrid structures. Friction spot joints of aluminium alloy 2024-T3 and carbon fibre-reinforced poly(phenylene sulphide) composite laminate (CF-PPS) were produced with an additional PPS film interlayer. Two different film thicknesses were investigated in this study: 100 and 500 μm. Lap shear testing demonstrated that the joints produced with 100-μm film (2093 ± 180 N) were stronger than the joints with 500 μm (708 ± 69 N). Additionally, the fracture surface analysis revealed a larger bonding area for the joints with 100-μm film (53 ± 2 mm<sup>2</sup>) as compared to the joints with 500-μm film (40 ± 1 mm<sup>2</sup>). Considering the low thermal conductivity of PPS, the thinnest film is more likely to soften by the frictional heat during the joining process. Hence, the low viscosity of the molten PPS favours the wettability of the parts’ surfaces. Microstructural analyses proved that the metallic nub formation and the interdiffusion of PPS chains between film and composite matrix are also favoured for thinner film use. Thus, superior adhesion between the partners is achieved. Therefore, it was concluded that the addition of the thinnest film interlayer leads to stronger joints.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • aluminium
  • aluminium alloy
  • composite
  • viscosity
  • thermal conductivity
  • joining
  • interdiffusion