People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Miranda, Rm
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2019Evaluation of the amount of nanoparticles emitted in LASER additive manufacture/weldingcitations
- 2017Experimental characterization of nanoparticles emissions during Laser Shock Processing of AA6061, AISI304 and Ti6Al4V
- 2017Determination of "safe" and "critical" nanoparticles exposure to welders in a workshopcitations
- 2015Assessment and control of nanoparticles exposure in welding operations by use of a Control Banding Toolcitations
- 2014The effect of metal transfer modes and shielding gas composition on the emission of ultrafine particles in MAG steel weldingcitations
- 2014EMISSION OF NANOPARTICLES DURING FRICTION STIR WELDING (FSW) OF ALUMINIUM ALLOYScitations
- 2014Characterization of airborne particles generated from metal active gas welding processcitations
- 2012Comparison of deposited surface area of airborne ultrafine particles generated from two welding processescitations
- 2006Fume emissions during gas metal arc weldingcitations
- 2005Analysis of welding fumes: A short note on the comparison between two sampling techniquescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Fume emissions during gas metal arc welding
Abstract
The control of exposure to welding fumes is of increasing importance in promoting a healthy, safe and productive work environment. This article describes the effects of shielding gas composition on the amount and composition of welding fumes produced during gas metal arc welding (GMAW). The amount of fumes generated during welding was measured for steady current over a range of wire-feed speeds and arc voltages using the standard procedures contained in ANSI/AWS F1.2 [American Welding Society. ANSI/AWS F1.2. Laboratory method for measuring fume generation rates and total fume emission of welding and allied processes. Miami, Florida; 1992]. Results of these measurements show that the fume formation rates (FFRs) increase with CO 2 and O 2 in the shielding gas mixture. The lowest FFRs were obtained with the mixtures of Ar + 2%CO 2 and Ar + 3%CO 2 + 1%O 2 . The highest FFRs were obtained with the mixtures of Ar + 18%CO 2 and Ar + 5%CO 2 + 4%O 2 . The welding fumes contains mainly iron, manganese, silicon, titanium and sodium under oxide forms. The fume cluster particles have dimensions between 0.5 and 2 μm. The FFR was found to be governed by the transfer modes of molten metal, i.e. the current intensity and arc voltage, as well as by the shielding gas mixtures composition. Thus these parameters have to be taken into consideration before designing a welding process. Whenever possible, users of GMAW should use the lowest current intensity. However, when this is not possible, due to the constraints of process productivity, welders should use higher currents, but with Ar + 2%CO 2 and Ar + 3%CO 2 + 1%O 2 shielding mixtures, which will lead to smaller fume emissions. © 2006 Taylor & Francis.