Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Miranda, Rm

  • Google
  • 10
  • 21
  • 172

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (10/10 displayed)

  • 2019Evaluation of the amount of nanoparticles emitted in LASER additive manufacture/welding7citations
  • 2017Experimental characterization of nanoparticles emissions during Laser Shock Processing of AA6061, AISI304 and Ti6Al4Vcitations
  • 2017Determination of "safe" and "critical" nanoparticles exposure to welders in a workshop4citations
  • 2015Assessment and control of nanoparticles exposure in welding operations by use of a Control Banding Tool23citations
  • 2014The effect of metal transfer modes and shielding gas composition on the emission of ultrafine particles in MAG steel welding6citations
  • 2014EMISSION OF NANOPARTICLES DURING FRICTION STIR WELDING (FSW) OF ALUMINIUM ALLOYS7citations
  • 2014Characterization of airborne particles generated from metal active gas welding process25citations
  • 2012Comparison of deposited surface area of airborne ultrafine particles generated from two welding processes32citations
  • 2006Fume emissions during gas metal arc welding61citations
  • 2005Analysis of welding fumes: A short note on the comparison between two sampling techniques7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Albuquerque, Pc
3 / 3 shared
Gomes, Jf
8 / 8 shared
Oliveira, Jp
1 / 2 shared
Esteves, Hm
1 / 1 shared
Porro, Ja
1 / 1 shared
Ocana, Jl
1 / 1 shared
Pereira, Ca
1 / 1 shared
Quintino, Ml
1 / 1 shared
Carvalho, Pa
2 / 3 shared
Santos, Tj
1 / 1 shared
Guerreiro, C.
1 / 1 shared
Santos, Tjg
1 / 1 shared
Albuquerque, P.
1 / 1 shared
Carvalho, P.
1 / 15 shared
Santos, Tg
1 / 2 shared
Vieira, Mt
1 / 6 shared
Pires, I.
1 / 3 shared
Gomes, Jfp
2 / 6 shared
Quintino, L.
1 / 5 shared
Cosme, Nm
1 / 1 shared
Ascenco, Cg
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2017
2015
2014
2012
2006
2005

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Albuquerque, Pc
  • Gomes, Jf
  • Oliveira, Jp
  • Esteves, Hm
  • Porro, Ja
  • Ocana, Jl
  • Pereira, Ca
  • Quintino, Ml
  • Carvalho, Pa
  • Santos, Tj
  • Guerreiro, C.
  • Santos, Tjg
  • Albuquerque, P.
  • Carvalho, P.
  • Santos, Tg
  • Vieira, Mt
  • Pires, I.
  • Gomes, Jfp
  • Quintino, L.
  • Cosme, Nm
  • Ascenco, Cg
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fume emissions during gas metal arc welding

  • Pires, I.
  • Gomes, Jfp
  • Quintino, L.
  • Miranda, Rm
Abstract

The control of exposure to welding fumes is of increasing importance in promoting a healthy, safe and productive work environment. This article describes the effects of shielding gas composition on the amount and composition of welding fumes produced during gas metal arc welding (GMAW). The amount of fumes generated during welding was measured for steady current over a range of wire-feed speeds and arc voltages using the standard procedures contained in ANSI/AWS F1.2 [American Welding Society. ANSI/AWS F1.2. Laboratory method for measuring fume generation rates and total fume emission of welding and allied processes. Miami, Florida; 1992]. Results of these measurements show that the fume formation rates (FFRs) increase with CO 2 and O 2 in the shielding gas mixture. The lowest FFRs were obtained with the mixtures of Ar + 2%CO 2 and Ar + 3%CO 2 + 1%O 2 . The highest FFRs were obtained with the mixtures of Ar + 18%CO 2 and Ar + 5%CO 2 + 4%O 2 . The welding fumes contains mainly iron, manganese, silicon, titanium and sodium under oxide forms. The fume cluster particles have dimensions between 0.5 and 2 μm. The FFR was found to be governed by the transfer modes of molten metal, i.e. the current intensity and arc voltage, as well as by the shielding gas mixtures composition. Thus these parameters have to be taken into consideration before designing a welding process. Whenever possible, users of GMAW should use the lowest current intensity. However, when this is not possible, due to the constraints of process productivity, welders should use higher currents, but with Ar + 2%CO 2 and Ar + 3%CO 2 + 1%O 2 shielding mixtures, which will lead to smaller fume emissions. © 2006 Taylor & Francis.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • cluster
  • Sodium
  • Silicon
  • titanium
  • iron
  • wire
  • Manganese