Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Singholi, Ajay K. S.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Fuzzy logic-driven genetic algorithm strategies for ultrasonic welding of heterogeneous metal sheets1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Giri, Dr. Jayant
1 / 7 shared
Me, Satishkumar P.
1 / 2 shared
Guru, Ajay
1 / 1 shared
Amale, Ashvin
1 / 1 shared
Albaijan, Ibrahim
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Giri, Dr. Jayant
  • Me, Satishkumar P.
  • Guru, Ajay
  • Amale, Ashvin
  • Albaijan, Ibrahim
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fuzzy logic-driven genetic algorithm strategies for ultrasonic welding of heterogeneous metal sheets

  • Giri, Dr. Jayant
  • Me, Satishkumar P.
  • Guru, Ajay
  • Singholi, Ajay K. S.
  • Amale, Ashvin
  • Albaijan, Ibrahim
Abstract

<jats:p>There are a lot of problems with the conventional fusion welding process, so ultrasonic welding has been used for about 20 years and has helped a lot of manufacturing industries, including aviation, medicine, and microelectronics. Ultrasonic welding takes less than one second, making it suitable for mass production. Poor weld quality and joint strength are common issues that industries encounter as a result of this process. Actually, the success and quality of the welding are determined by its control parameters. This research examines the impacts of weld time, vibrational amplitude, and weld pressure on the welding of 0.6 mm thick sheets of two different metals, specifically copper and aluminum (AA2024). Responses, including tensile shear stress, weld area, and T-peel stress, are acquired through experiments that follow a full factorial design including four replicas. The highest recorded tensile shear stress was 4.34 MPa, the maximum weld area measured was 63.6 mm2, and the peak T-peel stress reached 1.22 MPa. A second-order non-linear regression model was constructed using all of these data points, which related the responses to the predictors. Due to the importance of quality in the production sector, the process parameters were determined by the combination of genetic algorithm (GA) and fuzzy logic (FL) approaches. The impact of the weld zone temperature on various quality characteristics has been investigated through experiments. It has been noted from the confirmatory test that FL produces superior output outcomes compared to the genetic algorithm, with FL achieving a fuzzy multi-performance index of 0.94 compared to 0.61 for GA. By conducting microstructural analysis, weld quality levels, including “under-weld,” “good weld,” and “over-weld,” were established.</jats:p>

Topics
  • experiment
  • aluminium
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • copper
  • ultrasonic