Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Vilutis, Almontas

  • Google
  • 2
  • 2
  • 4

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Frictional behavior of wood-plastic composites against PVD-coated cemented carbidecitations
  • 2021Investigation of technological factors influencing the strength of bonded Al – alloy4citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jankauskas, Vytenis
2 / 50 shared
Reneckis, Vainius
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jankauskas, Vytenis
  • Reneckis, Vainius
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Frictional behavior of wood-plastic composites against PVD-coated cemented carbide

  • Vilutis, Almontas
  • Jankauskas, Vytenis
Abstract

Wood-plastic composites (WPC) are becoming increasingly popular due to many benefits, including the abilityto use recycled raw materials that conserve natural resources and solve environmental problems. Since the tool and theworkpiece are in contact during machining, the optimization of friction processes requires significant attention. This workinvestigates the dry friction parameters of two different WPCs with a WC-Co hard alloy coated with PVD layers of differentcompositions. The tests with a tribometer were conducted using the rotating disc (WPC) - flat plate (WC-Co + PVD)scheme. The sliding distance, the normal force and the contact temperature were measured. The results of the regressionanalysis showed that the data obtained are best approximated by a complete second-degree polynomial model (adjustedcoefficient of determination R2 >0.99). The most important factors examined are the normal force F and the contacttemperature T. The coated cemented carbide tools had an average coating thickness of 1.61±0.13 m and an increase inroughness of 10.8%. Compared to WPC-B samples, the average volumetric wear was 4.6 times higher for WPC-A samples.Due to the lower thermal conductivity of PVD coatings, heat could not be dissipated effectively in the cemented carbidesubstrate. With all PVD coatings, the dynamic coefficient of friction of WPC-A was 48% lower than with the uncoatedblade. In contrast, the coefficient of friction of WPC-B with three different coatings was 14% higher than that of theuncoated blade. The change in roughness, coefficient of friction values, and wear rate of the PVD coatings, on the otherhand, was smaller with WPC-B. With both composites, the C1-coded coating was the best for overall friction and weareffects. Surfaces were also examined using SEM, as well as EDS analysis.

Topics
  • surface
  • polymer
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • physical vapor deposition
  • carbide
  • composite
  • Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
  • wood
  • thermal conductivity
  • coefficient of friction