| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Siebentritt, Susanne
University of Luxembourg
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (18/18 displayed)
- 2024Improved sequentially processed Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 by Ag alloying
- 2024Composition dependence of electronic defects in CuGaS2citations
- 2024Improved Sequentially Processed Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)<sub>2</sub> by Ag Alloying
- 2023Chalcopyrite solar cells —state-of-the-art and options for improvementcitations
- 2023On the Origin of Tail States and Open Circuit Voltage Losses in Cu(In,Ga)Se2citations
- 2023Post‐deposition annealing and interfacial atomic layer deposition buffer layers of Sb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>3</sub>/CdS stacks for reduced interface recombination and increased open‐circuit voltagescitations
- 2023CuIn(Se,Te)2 absorbers with bandgaps <1 eV for bottom cells in tandem applications
- 2022Low temperature (Zn,Sn)O deposition for reducing interface open-circuit voltage deficit to achieve highly efficient Se-free Cu(In,Ga)S2 solar cellscitations
- 2022How much gallium do we need for a p-type Cu(In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub>?citations
- 2021Passivating Surface Defects and Reducing Interface Recombination in CuInS<sub>2</sub> Solar Cells by a Facile Solution Treatmentcitations
- 2021The impact of Kelvin probe force microscopy operation modes and environment on grain boundary band bending in perovskite and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cellscitations
- 2020Oxidation as Key Mechanism for Efficient Interface Passivation in Cu (In,Ga)Se2 Thin-Film Solar Cells
- 2020Ultra-thin passivation layers in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells: full-area passivated front contacts and their impact on bulk doping
- 2016Cu–Zn disorder and band gap fluctuations in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 : Theoretical and experimental investigationscitations
- 2015Epitaxial Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin films and devicescitations
- 2014Single second laser annealed CuInSe2 semiconductors from electrodeposited precursors as absorber layers for solar cellscitations
- 2012Thin film solar cells based on the ternary compound Cu2SnS3citations
- 2008Photoluminescence and Raman spectra of the ordered vacancy compound CuGa5Se8citations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
How much gallium do we need for a p-type Cu(In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub>?
Abstract
<jats:p> Doping in the chalcopyrite Cu(In,Ga)Se<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> is determined by intrinsic point defects. In the ternary CuInSe<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>, both N-type conductivity and P-type conductivity can be obtained depending on the growth conditions and stoichiometry: N-type is obtained when grown Cu-poor, Se-poor, and alkali-free. CuGaSe<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>, on the other hand, is found to be always a P-type semiconductor that seems to resist all kinds of N-type doping, no matter whether it comes from native defects or extrinsic impurities. In this work, we study the N-to-P transition in Cu-poor Cu(In,Ga)Se<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> single crystals in dependence of the gallium content. Our results show that Cu(In,Ga)Se<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> can still be grown as an N-type semiconductor until the gallium content reaches the critical concentration of 15%–19%, where the N-to-P transition occurs. Furthermore, trends in the Seebeck coefficient and activation energies extracted from temperature-dependent conductivity measurements demonstrate that the carrier concentration drops by around two orders of magnitude near the transition concentration. Our proposed model explains the N-to-P transition based on the differences in formation energies of donor and acceptor defects caused by the addition of gallium. </jats:p>