People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Sercombe, Tim
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (23/23 displayed)
- 2023On the importance of nano-oxide control in laser powder bed fusion manufactured Ni-based alloys to enhance fracture propertiescitations
- 2023Dynamic constitutive behavior of LPBFed metal alloyscitations
- 2022Bioactivity and biodegradability of high temperature sintered 58S ceramicscitations
- 2022High strain-rate response of additively manufactured light metal alloyscitations
- 2020The effect of drying method on the surface structure of mesoporous sol-gel derived bioactive glass-ceramiccitations
- 2018Mechanical behaviour of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D bioprintingcitations
- 2017On the Breakdown of SiC during the Selective Laser Melting of Aluminum Matrix Compositescitations
- 2016A 3D printed superconducting aluminium microwave cavitycitations
- 2016Selective laser melting of Zr-based bulk metallic glassescitations
- 2016Selective laser melting of Al-12Si alloy: Enhanced densification via powder dryingcitations
- 2011Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of a biomedical Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn alloycitations
- 2008Heat treatment of Ti-6Al-7Nb components produced by selective laser meltingcitations
- 2008Process repeatability and sources of error in indirect SLS of aluminiumcitations
- 2007The Effect of Particle Shape on the Sintering of Aluminumcitations
- 2006Process shrinkage and accuracy during indirect laser sintering of aluminiumcitations
- 2005Sintering of maraging steel with phosphorous additionscitations
- 2004On the role of magnesium and nitrogen in the infiltration of aluminium by aluminium for rapid prototyping applicationscitations
- 2004On the role of tin in the infiltration of aluminium by aluminium for rapid prototyping applicationscitations
- 2003Sintering of freeformed maraging steel with boron additionscitations
- 2003The effect of resin type on the sintering of freeformed maraging steelcitations
- 2003On the sintering of uncompacted, pre-alloyed Al powder alloyscitations
- 2003Rapid manufacturing of aluminum componentscitations
- 2001Liquid phase sintering of aluminium alloyscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
A 3D printed superconducting aluminium microwave cavity
Abstract
© 2016 Author(s).3D printing of plastics, ceramics, and metals has existed for several decades and has revolutionized many areas of manufacturing and science. Printing of metals, in particular, has found a number of applications in fields as diverse as customized medical implants, jet engine bearings, and rapid prototyping in the automotive industry. Although many techniques are used for 3D printing metals, they commonly rely on computer controlled melting or sintering of a metal alloy powder using a laser or electron beam. The mechanical properties of parts produced in such a way have been well studied, but little attention has been paid to their electrical properties. Here we show that a microwave cavity (resonant frequencies 9.9 and 11.2 GHz) 3D printed using an Al-12Si alloy exhibits superconductivity when cooled below the critical temperature of aluminium (1.2 K), with a performance comparable with the common 6061 alloy of aluminium. Superconducting cavities find application in numerous areas of physics, from particle accelerators to cavity quantum electrodynamics experiments. The result is achieved even with a very large concentration of non-superconducting silicon in the alloy of 12.18%, compared with Al-6061, which has between 0.4% and 0.8%. Our results may pave the way for the possibility of 3D printing superconducting cavity configurations that are otherwise impossible to machine.