Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nawaz, Waleed

  • Google
  • 6
  • 17
  • 36

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Effects of Replacing Cement with GGBS and Fly Ash on the Flexural and Shear Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams5citations
  • 2023Shear performance of lightweight SCC composite beam internally reinforced with CFRP laminate stirrups and GFRP bars4citations
  • 2023The effect of CFRP strip stirrups on the shear strength of SCC high strength lightweight concrete beams6citations
  • 2023Shear strengthening performance of fiber reinforced lightweight SCC beams2citations
  • 2022Shear strengthening of high strength lightweight SCC beams internally reinforced with GFRP bars and external CFRP strips6citations
  • 2020Lap splices in confined self-compacting lightweight concrete13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Zadeh, A. Sharif
1 / 1 shared
Abdalla, J. A.
1 / 1 shared
Hawileh, R. A.
1 / 2 shared
Khartabil, A.
1 / 1 shared
Shantia, M.
1 / 1 shared
Mirghani, A.
1 / 1 shared
Nassara, A. Al
1 / 1 shared
Yehia, Sherif
3 / 11 shared
Yang, Bo
2 / 20 shared
Al-Ameri, Riyad
1 / 1 shared
Liu, Huiyuan
1 / 3 shared
Hassanli, Reza
1 / 10 shared
Pham, Thong M.
1 / 5 shared
Nie, Shidong
1 / 1 shared
Ayough, P.
1 / 1 shared
Yehia, S.
2 / 3 shared
Guo, Xiao
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Zadeh, A. Sharif
  • Abdalla, J. A.
  • Hawileh, R. A.
  • Khartabil, A.
  • Shantia, M.
  • Mirghani, A.
  • Nassara, A. Al
  • Yehia, Sherif
  • Yang, Bo
  • Al-Ameri, Riyad
  • Liu, Huiyuan
  • Hassanli, Reza
  • Pham, Thong M.
  • Nie, Shidong
  • Ayough, P.
  • Yehia, S.
  • Guo, Xiao
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effects of Replacing Cement with GGBS and Fly Ash on the Flexural and Shear Performance of Reinforced Concrete Beams

  • Zadeh, A. Sharif
  • Abdalla, J. A.
  • Hawileh, R. A.
  • Khartabil, A.
  • Shantia, M.
  • Nawaz, Waleed
  • Mirghani, A.
  • Nassara, A. Al
Abstract

<p>Cement has historically been a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, and substituting cement in concrete with alternative cementitious materials will lead to a decrease in carbon footprints. A vast amount of literature focuses on the mechanical properties and performance of concrete partially replaced with different cementitious materials. However, the literature on the structural performance of concrete with different cementitious materials is very limited. Therefore, the main aim of the current experimental study is to evaluate the flexural and shear performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams cast with various replacement percentages of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and fly ash. A total of 33 RC beams were cast with 50% and 70% replacement of cement with GGBS and fly ash. In addition, the tensile and compressive strengths of the different mixes with GGBS and fly ash were also compared with the 100% OPC mix at 28 and 56 days. All beams were subjected to monotonic four-point bending tests and load-deflection response curves along with failure modes were presented. The experimental results showed that the average compressive and tensile strength of mixes with GGBS and fly ash replacement were comparable with OPC. The mixes with 50% replacement and higher usage of GGBS showed higher compressive strengths compared to mixes with 70% replacement. In addition, the flexural performance of beams with GGBS and fly ash were comparable to the specimen with 100% OPC. Even GGBS and fly ash replacement increased the stiffness and yield strength of the beam specimens by 36 and 16% compared to the control specimen. The specimens tested at 56 days with higher usage of fly ash and 50% replacement showed the highest flexural load as compared with other specimens. In the case of the shear specimens, the normalized ultimate shear capacity of RC beams is not significantly affected when OPC is replaced with 50% and 70% of GGBS and fly ash, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the overall behavior of SCM beams was comparable to that of the control OPC beams. The ACI 318-19 design guidelines were also used to predict the flexural and shear capacity of RC beams cast with GGBS and fly ash. The aforementioned experiments indicate the viability and effectiveness of cement replacements in concrete with SCM, which in return, contribute to lower carbon footprints.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • experiment
  • strength
  • cement
  • bending flexural test
  • yield strength
  • tensile strength