Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Shariatmadari, Nader

  • Google
  • 2
  • 8
  • 206

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Clayey soil stabilization using alkali-activated volcanic ash and slag158citations
  • 2021Compressive strength of sandy soils stabilized with alkali-activated volcanic ash and slag48citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jahandari, Soheil
1 / 5 shared
Ghadir, Pooria
2 / 8 shared
Tao, Zhong
1 / 1 shared
Siddique, Rafat
1 / 3 shared
Miraki, Hania
1 / 3 shared
Moharami, Farshad
1 / 1 shared
Hasanzadehshooiili, Hadi
1 / 1 shared
Saeidi, Fatemeh
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jahandari, Soheil
  • Ghadir, Pooria
  • Tao, Zhong
  • Siddique, Rafat
  • Miraki, Hania
  • Moharami, Farshad
  • Hasanzadehshooiili, Hadi
  • Saeidi, Fatemeh
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Compressive strength of sandy soils stabilized with alkali-activated volcanic ash and slag

  • Moharami, Farshad
  • Ghadir, Pooria
  • Hasanzadehshooiili, Hadi
  • Shariatmadari, Nader
  • Saeidi, Fatemeh
Abstract

<p>In recent years, compared with the traditional portland cement, environmentally friendly geopolymers have gained more attention as construction materials. This paper considered volcanic ash (VA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) in different percentages (0%, 3%, 7%, and 10%) as a replacement for the conventionally used portland cement to stabilize sandy soils. NaOH and Na2SiO3 in different concentrations (4, 8, and 12 M) and alkali to binder ratios (1, 1.5, 2, and 3) were used as alkali activator solutions to build new geopolymers. Samples were cured at both ambient and oven temperatures and for 1, 7, and 28 days. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of samples then was evaluated. Two predictive approaches, artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and the evolutionary polynomial regression technique (EPR), were applied to model UCS of geopolymerized sand samples. Regarding the high value of the coefficient of determination of the proposed ANN, 97%, and acceptable prediction errors, RMS error of 0.0439 and MAE of 0.0336, an 8-5-10-1 ANN was introduced as a more accurate tool for the prediction of UCS. Next, three-dimensional parametrical studies investigated the effects of simultaneous changes in alkali solution, binder, and curing condition parameters on UCS values of geopolymerized samples. Sensitivity analysis based on the cosine amplitude method introduced the Si/Al ratio as the parameter most affecting and VA content as the parameter least affecting the compressive strength of samples. Results were analyzed further using pH and electrical conductivity tests and interpreted based on microstructural investigations using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and X-ray diffraction analysis.</p>

Topics
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • x-ray diffraction
  • strength
  • cement
  • electron spin resonance spectroscopy
  • electrical conductivity
  • curing
  • microwave-assisted extraction