Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Feddal, Ikram

  • Google
  • 3
  • 5
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024Numerical and experimental investigation of quasi-static indentation response of PVC foam sandwich and GFRP laminated composites2citations
  • 2022Comparative study on the successive impact behavior of composites in ship structurescitations
  • 2022Delamination buckling of a laminated composite shell panel using cohesive zone modelling3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hasnaoui, Mohamed El
1 / 2 shared
Magri, Anouar El
1 / 2 shared
Zniker, Houcine
1 / 1 shared
Kouifat, Mohammed Khalil El
1 / 1 shared
Khamlichi, Abdelatif
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hasnaoui, Mohamed El
  • Magri, Anouar El
  • Zniker, Houcine
  • Kouifat, Mohammed Khalil El
  • Khamlichi, Abdelatif
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparative study on the successive impact behavior of composites in ship structures

  • Feddal, Ikram
Abstract

<jats:p>Composite materials are categorized to be highly sensitive to low-velocity impact events. This feature is considered as a serious limitation for their application in engineering. Therefore, understanding impact energy absorption is critical in improving composite material damage tolerance and especially under successive impacts. This work was dedicated to an experimental investigation that aims to study and compare the energy absorption ability and damage behavior of PVC-foam sandwich and GFRP laminated composites under multiple impacts occurring at small energy levels. For this purpose, low-velocity impact repeated tests were carried out until total absorption of the impact initial energy was reached. A relative energy absorption index and a rebound index were proposed in order to assess energy absorption capacity. The results indicated that, directly after the first impact, the sandwich composite formed from two 4mm laminated skins absorbed 80% of the initial impact energy, in comparison to approximately 60% for 8mm laminated composite. This performance of sandwich composite is attributed to the damping ability of the core. Also, the impact velocity rebound rate of this composite was found to be higher than that of laminates. However, impact damage is greater in composite sandwiches than in laminates.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • composite