Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Chung, S. Y.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 6

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2006Low sidewall damage plasma etching using ICP-RIE with HBr chemistry of Si/SiGe resonant interband tunnel diodes6citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Thompson, P. E.
1 / 1 shared
Yu, R.
1 / 5 shared
Berger, Paul R.
1 / 16 shared
Park, S. Y.
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2006

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Thompson, P. E.
  • Yu, R.
  • Berger, Paul R.
  • Park, S. Y.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Low sidewall damage plasma etching using ICP-RIE with HBr chemistry of Si/SiGe resonant interband tunnel diodes

  • Chung, S. Y.
  • Thompson, P. E.
  • Yu, R.
  • Berger, Paul R.
  • Park, S. Y.
Abstract

<p>The effect and influence of dry plasma etching processes of Si/SiGe using HBr for the formation of diode mesa structures has been investigated to minimise sidewall leakage current. To characterise sidewall damage electrically, Si-based resonant interband tunnel diodes (RITD) were processed and the completed RITDs compared by their peak-to-valley current ratio (PVCR) and valley current density (VCD), which are sensitive to defect related currents. Dry processed RITDs were compared to reference RITDs fabricated by wet chemical etching (HNO<sub>3</sub>:HF:H<sub>2</sub>O=100:1:100). The combination of HBr process gas and very low substrate bias power (10W) for inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) yielded the better results. The resulting RITDs processed by ICP-RIE using HBr chemistry show high PVCR of 4.02 with VCD of 32A/cm<sup>2</sup> while wet etched RITDs show a PVCR of only 2.81 with VCD of 40A/cm<sup>2</sup>. Hydrogen passivation during the HBr plasma process may play a role that overcomes the slightly higher surface roughness compared to wet etching.</p>

Topics
  • density
  • surface
  • Hydrogen
  • defect
  • current density
  • plasma etching
  • wet etching