Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Snowdon, Alexandra A.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 4
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Surface properties influence marine biofilm rheology, with implications for ship drag7citations
  • 2023Developing artificial biofilms for investigating the effects of physico-mechanical properties on marine biofilm-associated dragcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Longyear, Jennifer E.
1 / 1 shared
Stoodley, Paul
1 / 12 shared
Wharton, Julian A.
1 / 27 shared
Dennington, Simon P.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Longyear, Jennifer E.
  • Stoodley, Paul
  • Wharton, Julian A.
  • Dennington, Simon P.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Surface properties influence marine biofilm rheology, with implications for ship drag

  • Longyear, Jennifer E.
  • Stoodley, Paul
  • Snowdon, Alexandra A.
  • Wharton, Julian A.
  • Dennington, Simon P.
Abstract

Marine biofilms on ship hulls increase frictional drag, which has economic and environmental consequences. It is hypothesised that biofilm mechanics, such as viscoelasticity, play a critical role in biofilm-associated drag, yet is a poorly studied area. The current study aimed to rheologically characterise ship-relevant marine biofilms. To combat marine biofilms on ship hulls, fouling-control coatings are often applied; therefore, the effect of different surfaces on marine biofilm mechanics was also investigated. Three surfaces were tested: a non-biocidal, chemically inert foul-release coating (FRC), an inert primer (ACP) and inert PVC. Physical properties of biofilms were explored using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and a parallel-plate rheometer was used for rheological testing. Image analysis revealed differences in the thickness, roughness, and percent coverage between the different biofilms. Rheological testing showed that marine biofilms, grown on FRC and ACP acted as viscoelastic materials, although there were differences. FRC biofilms had a lower shear modulus, a higher viscosity, and a higher yield stress than the ACP biofilms, suggesting that the FRC biofilms were more readily deformable but potentially more robust. The results confirmed that surface treatment influences the structural and mechanical properties of ship-relevant marine biofilms, which could have implications for drag. A better understanding of how different surface treatments affect marine biofilm rheology is required to improve our knowledge on biofilm fluid-structure interactions and to better inform the coating industry of strategies to control biofilm formation and reduce drag.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • tomography
  • viscosity
  • viscoelasticity