People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Lieberzeit, Peter
University of Vienna
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (18/18 displayed)
- 2024Novel Approach for the Immobilization of Cellobiose Dehydrogenase in PEDOT:PSS Conductive Layer on Planar Gold Electrodescitations
- 2023Bioanalytische Sensoren auf der Basis von Wärmeleitungeffektencitations
- 2023L-Ascorbic Acid Treatment of Electrochemical Graphene Nanosheets: Reduction Optimization and Application for De-Icing, Water Uptake Prevention, and Corrosion Resistancecitations
- 2022Development of conductive molecularly imprinted polymers (cMIPs) for limonene to improve and interconnect QCM and chemiresistor sensingcitations
- 2021Biomimetic Sensors to Detect Bioanalytes in Real-Life Samples Using Molecularly Imprinted Polymerscitations
- 2021Imprinted polymer and Cu2O-graphene oxide nanocomposite for the detection of disease biomarkerscitations
- 2021Novel dual-sensor for creatinine and 8-hydroxy-2 '-deoxyguanosine using carbon-paste electrode modified with molecularly imprinted polymers and multiple-pulse amperometrycitations
- 2020Molecularly imprinted polymeric coatings for sensitive and selective gravimetric detection of artemethercitations
- 2020Design of heterostructured hybrids comprising ultrathin 2D bismuth tungstate nanosheets reinforced by chloramphenicol imprinted polymers used as biomimetic interfaces for mass-sensitive detectioncitations
- 2020Novel amino-containing molecularly-imprinted polymer coating on magnetite-gold core for sensitive and selective carbofuran detection in foodcitations
- 2019Highly sensitive and selective electrochemical paper-based device using a graphite screen-printed electrode modified with molecularly imprinted polymers coated Fe3O4@Au@SiO2 for serotonin determinationcitations
- 2018Investigating nanohybrid material based on 3D CNTs@Cu nanoparticle composite and imprinted polymer for highly selective detection of chloramphenicolcitations
- 2017A novel method for dengue virus detection and antibody screening using a graphene-polymer based electrochemical biosensorcitations
- 2016A Self-Organisation Synthesis Approach for Bacteria Molecularly Imprinted Polymerscitations
- 2014Molecularly imprinted polymer-Ag2S nanoparticle composites for sensing volatile organicscitations
- 2009Generating Bio-Analogous Recognition of Artificial Materials - Sensors and Electronic Noses for Odours
- 2007Printing materials in micro- and nano-scale: Systems for process control
- 2003Chemical sensors - From molecules, complex mixtures to cells - Supramolecular imprinting strategiescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Molecularly imprinted polymeric coatings for sensitive and selective gravimetric detection of artemether
Abstract
Monitoring antimalarial drugs is necessary for clinical assays, human health, and routine quality control practices in pharmaceutical industries. Herein, we present the development of sensor coatings based on molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) combined with quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) for sensitive and selective gravimetric detection of an antimalarial drug: artemether. The MIP coatings are synthesized by using artemether as the template in a poly(methacrylic acid-co-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) matrix. Artemether-MIP and the non-imprinted polymer (NIP) control or reference layers are deposited on 10 MHz dual-electrode QCM by spin coating (187 +/- 9 nm layer thickness after optimization). The coatings are characterized by FTIR spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy that reveal marked differences among the MIP and NIP. The MIP-QCM sensor exhibits high sensitivity (0.51 Hz ppm(-1)) with sub-10 ppm detection and quantification limits. The MIP-QCM sensor also exhibits a 6-fold higher sensitivity compared to the NIP-QCM, and a dynamic working range of 30-100 ppm. The response time of MIP-QCM devices for a single cycle of analyte adsorption, signal saturation, and MIP regeneration is less than 2.5 min. The sensor also demonstrates selectivity factors of artemether-MIP of 2.2 and 4.1 compared to artemisinin and lumefantrine, respectively. Reversibility tests reveal less than 5% variation in sensor responses over three cycles of measurements at each tested concentration. The MIP-QCM showed lower detection limits than conventional HPLC-UV, and faster response time compared to HPLC-UV and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).