Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rolison, Debra R.

  • Google
  • 7
  • 19
  • 131

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2018Trapping a Ru₂O₃ Corundum-like Structure at Ultrathin, Disordered RuO₂ Nanoskins Expressed in 3Dcitations
  • 2018(Invited) Nanoscale Design and Modification of Plasmonic Aerogels for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generationcitations
  • 2017Effects of Nanoscale Interfacial Design on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation Activity at Plasmonic Au–TiO<sub>2</sub> and Au–TiO<sub>2</sub>/Pt Aerogelscitations
  • 2017Demonstrating the Activity and Stability of Conformal RuO<sub>2</sub> "Nanoskins" on Technologically-Relevant, 3D Electrode Suports for Water Oxidation in Acid Electrolytecitations
  • 2017Oxidation−Stable Plasmonic Copper Nanoparticles in Photocatalytic TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanoarchitecturescitations
  • 2013Plasmonic enhancement of visible-light water splitting with Au-TiO2 composite aerogels.131citations
  • 2013Electron Tomography of Gold Nanoparticles in Titania Composite Aerogels: Probing Structure to Understand Photochemistrycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Long, Jeffrey W.
1 / 4 shared
Mansour, Azzam N.
1 / 2 shared
Donakowski, Martin D.
1 / 3 shared
Chervin, Christopher N.
2 / 7 shared
Pala, Irina R.
1 / 3 shared
Desario, Paul
7 / 25 shared
Stroud, Rhonda
3 / 3 shared
Dunkelberger, Adam
1 / 1 shared
Baturina, Olga
3 / 5 shared
Owrutsky, Jeffrey C.
1 / 2 shared
Pitman, Catherine L.
1 / 3 shared
Pietron, Jeremy
4 / 11 shared
Brintlinger, Todd
5 / 10 shared
Sassin, Megan B.
1 / 4 shared
Nelson, Eric S.
1 / 3 shared
Parker, Joseph F.
1 / 4 shared
Devantier, Devyn E.
1 / 1 shared
Pietron, Jeremy J.
1 / 1 shared
Stroud, Rhonda M.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2017
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Long, Jeffrey W.
  • Mansour, Azzam N.
  • Donakowski, Martin D.
  • Chervin, Christopher N.
  • Pala, Irina R.
  • Desario, Paul
  • Stroud, Rhonda
  • Dunkelberger, Adam
  • Baturina, Olga
  • Owrutsky, Jeffrey C.
  • Pitman, Catherine L.
  • Pietron, Jeremy
  • Brintlinger, Todd
  • Sassin, Megan B.
  • Nelson, Eric S.
  • Parker, Joseph F.
  • Devantier, Devyn E.
  • Pietron, Jeremy J.
  • Stroud, Rhonda M.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Plasmonic enhancement of visible-light water splitting with Au-TiO2 composite aerogels.

  • Rolison, Debra R.
  • Pietron, Jeremy
  • Devantier, Devyn E.
  • Desario, Paul
  • Brintlinger, Todd
Abstract

We demonstrate plasmonic enhancement of visible-light-driven splitting of water at three-dimensionally (3D) networked gold–titania (Au–TiO2) aerogels. The sol–gel-derived ultraporous composite nanoarchitecture, which contains 1 to 8.5 wt% Au nanoparticles and titania in the anatase form, retains the high surface area and mesoporosity of unmodified TiO2 aerogels and maintains stable dispersion of the ∼5 nm Au guests. A broad surface plasmon resonance (SPR) feature centered at ∼550 nm is present for the Au–TiO2 aerogels, but not Au-free TiO2 aerogels, and spans a wide range of the visible spectrum. Gold-derived SPR in Au–TiO2 aerogels cast as films on transparent electrodes drives photoelectrochemical oxidation of aqueous hydroxide and extends the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 from the ultraviolet region to visible wavelengths exceeding 700 nm. Films of Au–TiO2 aerogels in which Au nanoparticles are deposited on pre-formed TiO2 aerogels by a deposition–precipitation method (DP Au/TiO2) also photoelectrochemically oxidize aqueous hydroxide, but less efficiently than 3D Au–TiO2, despite having an essentially identical Au nanoparticle weight fraction and size distribution. For example, 3D Au–TiO2 containing 1 wt% Au is as active as DP Au/TiO2 with 4 wt% Au. The higher photocatalytic activity of 3D Au–TiO2 derives only in part from its ability to retain the surface area and porosity of unmodified TiO2 aerogel. The magnitude of improvement indicates that in the 3D arrangement either a more accessible photoelectrochemical reaction interphase (three-phase boundary) exists or more efficient conversion of excited surface plasmons into charge carriers occurs, thereby amplifying reactivity over DP Au/TiO2. The difference in photocatalytic efficiency between the two forms of Au–TiO2 demonstrates the importance of defining the structure of Au‖TiO2 interfaces within catalytic Au–TiO2 nanoarchitectures.

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • dispersion
  • surface
  • phase
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • gold
  • composite
  • precipitation
  • porosity
  • phase boundary
  • surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy