Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Persson, Kristin A.

  • Google
  • 6
  • 39
  • 941

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Alkali‐Ion‐Assisted Activation of ε‐VOPO<sub>4</sub> as a Cathode Material for Mg‐Ion Batteries6citations
  • 2021Efficient calculation of carrier scattering rates from first principles393citations
  • 2020Conformational Entropy as a Means to Control the Behavior of Poly(diketoenamine) Vitrimers In and Out of Equilibrium78citations
  • 2019Efficient Pourbaix diagrams of many-element compounds119citations
  • 2018Evaluation of thermodynamic equations of state across chemistry and structure in the materials project57citations
  • 2016Mechanistic insights into chemical and photochemical transformations of bismuth vanadate photoanodes288citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kim, Jiyoon
1 / 1 shared
Chen, Qian
1 / 10 shared
Rutt, Ann
1 / 1 shared
Ceder, Gerbrand
1 / 9 shared
Hahn, Nathan T.
1 / 2 shared
Sari, Dogancan
1 / 1 shared
Park, Junsoo
1 / 2 shared
Faghaninia, Alireza
1 / 1 shared
Jain, Anubhav
1 / 4 shared
Ganose, Alex M.
1 / 4 shared
Wood, Brandon M.
1 / 1 shared
Dailing, Eric A.
1 / 1 shared
Helms, Brett
1 / 1 shared
Seguin, Trevor J.
1 / 2 shared
Christensen, Peter R.
1 / 1 shared
Walde, Rebecca
1 / 1 shared
He, Changfei
1 / 1 shared
Russell, Thomas P.
1 / 15 shared
Montoya, Joseph H.
1 / 2 shared
Nørskov, Jens Kehlet
1 / 32 shared
Patel, Anjli M.
1 / 4 shared
Dwaraknath, Shyam
1 / 2 shared
Latimer, Katherine
1 / 1 shared
Mathew, Kiran
1 / 1 shared
Mcdowell, Matthew T.
1 / 7 shared
Sharp, Ian D.
1 / 5 shared
Houle, Frances A.
1 / 1 shared
Larson, David M.
1 / 1 shared
Yu, Jie
1 / 1 shared
Cooper, Jason K.
1 / 1 shared
Chen, Le
1 / 2 shared
Kunzelmann, Viktoria
1 / 1 shared
Yang, Jinhui
1 / 1 shared
Borys, Nicholas J.
1 / 2 shared
Spurgeon, Joshua
1 / 1 shared
Shaner, Matthew R.
1 / 1 shared
Beeman, Jeffrey W.
1 / 5 shared
Toma, Francesca M.
1 / 2 shared
Abelyan, Christine
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2021
2020
2019
2018
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kim, Jiyoon
  • Chen, Qian
  • Rutt, Ann
  • Ceder, Gerbrand
  • Hahn, Nathan T.
  • Sari, Dogancan
  • Park, Junsoo
  • Faghaninia, Alireza
  • Jain, Anubhav
  • Ganose, Alex M.
  • Wood, Brandon M.
  • Dailing, Eric A.
  • Helms, Brett
  • Seguin, Trevor J.
  • Christensen, Peter R.
  • Walde, Rebecca
  • He, Changfei
  • Russell, Thomas P.
  • Montoya, Joseph H.
  • Nørskov, Jens Kehlet
  • Patel, Anjli M.
  • Dwaraknath, Shyam
  • Latimer, Katherine
  • Mathew, Kiran
  • Mcdowell, Matthew T.
  • Sharp, Ian D.
  • Houle, Frances A.
  • Larson, David M.
  • Yu, Jie
  • Cooper, Jason K.
  • Chen, Le
  • Kunzelmann, Viktoria
  • Yang, Jinhui
  • Borys, Nicholas J.
  • Spurgeon, Joshua
  • Shaner, Matthew R.
  • Beeman, Jeffrey W.
  • Toma, Francesca M.
  • Abelyan, Christine
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluation of thermodynamic equations of state across chemistry and structure in the materials project

  • Dwaraknath, Shyam
  • Latimer, Katherine
  • Persson, Kristin A.
  • Mathew, Kiran
Abstract

Thermodynamic equations of state (EOS) for crystalline solids describe material behaviors under changes in pressure, volume, entropy and temperature, making them fundamental to scientific research in a wide range of fields including geophysics, energy storage and development of novel materials. Despite over a century of theoretical development and experimental testing of energy-volume (E-V) EOS for solids, there is still a lack of consensus with regard to which equation is indeed optimal, as well as to what metric is most appropriate for making this judgment. In this study, several metrics were used to evaluate quality of fit for 8 different EOS across 87 elements and over 100 compounds which appear in the literature. Our findings do not indicate a clear "best" EOS, but we identify three which consistently perform well relative to the rest of the set. Furthermore, we find that for the aggregate data set, the RMSrD is not strongly correlated with the nature of the compound, e.g., whether it is a metal, insulator, or semiconductor, nor the bulk modulus for any of the EOS, indicating that a single equation can be used across a broad range of classes of materials.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • compound
  • semiconductor
  • bulk modulus