Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Vyas, Nina

  • Google
  • 2
  • 14
  • 86

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022A combination of soft X-ray and laser light sources offer 3D high content information on the native state of the cellular environmentcitations
  • 2021Biofilm viability checker86citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nahas, Kamal L.
1 / 1 shared
Jadhav, Archana C.
1 / 1 shared
Harkiolaki, Maria
1 / 1 shared
Taylor, Adam
1 / 3 shared
Fish, Thomas M.
1 / 1 shared
Okolo, Chidinma Adanna
1 / 1 shared
Shelton, Richard
1 / 8 shared
Sammons, Rachel
1 / 7 shared
Kuehne, Sarah
1 / 4 shared
Mountcastle, Sophie
1 / 2 shared
Villapun Puzas, Victor Manuel
1 / 5 shared
Walmsley, Anthony Damien
1 / 5 shared
Cox, Sophie C.
1 / 18 shared
Jabbari, Sara
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nahas, Kamal L.
  • Jadhav, Archana C.
  • Harkiolaki, Maria
  • Taylor, Adam
  • Fish, Thomas M.
  • Okolo, Chidinma Adanna
  • Shelton, Richard
  • Sammons, Rachel
  • Kuehne, Sarah
  • Mountcastle, Sophie
  • Villapun Puzas, Victor Manuel
  • Walmsley, Anthony Damien
  • Cox, Sophie C.
  • Jabbari, Sara
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Biofilm viability checker

  • Shelton, Richard
  • Sammons, Rachel
  • Kuehne, Sarah
  • Mountcastle, Sophie
  • Villapun Puzas, Victor Manuel
  • Walmsley, Anthony Damien
  • Cox, Sophie C.
  • Vyas, Nina
  • Jabbari, Sara
Abstract

Quantifying biofilm formation on surfaces is challenging because traditional microbiological methods, such as total colony-forming units (CFUs), often rely on manual counting. These are laborious, resource intensive techniques, more susceptible to human error. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is a high-resolution technique that allows 3D visualisation of biofilm architecture. In combination with a live/dead stain, it can be used to quantify biofilm viability on both transparent and opaque surfaces. However, there is little consensus on the appropriate methodology to apply in confocal micrograph processing. In this study, we report the development of an image analysis approach to repeatably quantify biofilm viability and surface coverage. We also demonstrate its use for a range of bacterial species and translational applications. This protocol has been created with ease of use and accessibility in mind, to enable researchers who do not specialise in computational techniques to be confident in applying these methods to analyse biofilm micrographs. Furthermore, the simplicity of the method enables the user to adapt it for their bespoke needs. Validation experiments demonstrate the automated analysis is robust and accurate across a range of bacterial species and an improvement on traditional microbiological analysis. Furthermore, application to translational case studies show the automated method is a reliable measurement of biomass and cell viability. This approach will ensure image analysis is an accessible option for those in the microbiology and biomaterials field, improve current detection approaches and ultimately support the development of novel strategies for preventing biofilm formation by ensuring comparability across studies.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • forming
  • biomaterials
  • confocal laser scanning microscopy