People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Lauritsen, Jeppe Vang
Aarhus University
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (25/25 displayed)
- 2023Atomic-Scale Site Characterization of Cu-Zn Exchange on Cu(111)citations
- 2023Steering carbon dioxide reduction toward C–C coupling using copper electrodes modified with porous molecular filmscitations
- 2023The interface of in-situ grown single-layer epitaxial MoS2 on SrTiO3(001) and (111)citations
- 2022Iron carbide formation on thin iron films grown on Cu(1 0 0)citations
- 2022WO3 Monomers Supported on Anatase TiO2(101), −(001), and Rutile TiO2(110)citations
- 2022Can the CO 2 Reduction Reaction Be Improved on Cu:Selectivity and Intrinsic Activity of Functionalized Cu Surfacescitations
- 2022Can the CO2Reduction Reaction Be Improved on Cucitations
- 2021Nanoscale Chevrel-Phase Mo6S8Prepared by a Molecular Precursor Approach for Highly Efficient Electrocatalysis of the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Mediacitations
- 2020Molecular Nanowire Bonding to Epitaxial Single-Layer MoS2 by an On-Surface Ullmann Coupling Reactioncitations
- 2020Cubes on a string:a series of linear coordination polymers with cubane-like nodes and dicarboxylate linkerscitations
- 2019Anisotropic iron-doping patterns in two-dimensional cobalt oxide nanoislands on Au(111)citations
- 2019Structural and electronic properties of Fe dopants in cobalt oxide nanoislands on Au(111)citations
- 2018Phase Transitions of Cobalt Oxide Bilayers on Au(111) and Pt(111)citations
- 2018Topotactic Growth of Edge-Terminated MoS 2 from MoO 2 Nanocrystalscitations
- 2018Topotactic Growth of Edge-Terminated MoS2 from MoO2 Nanocrystalscitations
- 2017Gold-supported two-dimensional cobalt oxyhydroxide (CoOOH) and multilayer cobalt oxide islandscitations
- 2017Edge reactivity and water-assisted dissociation on cobalt oxide nanoislandscitations
- 2015Electronic Structure of Epitaxial Single-Layer MoS2citations
- 2015Noncontact AFM Imaging of Atomic Defects on the Rutile TiO2 (110) Surfacecitations
- 2015Electronic structure of epitaxial single-layer MoS2citations
- 2015Synthesis of Epitaxial Single-Layer MoS2 on Au(111)citations
- 2014Structure and Electronic Properties of In Situ Synthesized Single-Layer MoS2 on a Gold Surfacecitations
- 2014Structure and Electronic Properties of In Situ Synthesized Single-Layer MoS 2 on a Gold Surfacecitations
- 2011Atomic-scale non-contact AFM studies of alumina supported nanoparticles
- 2011Stabilization Principles for Polar Surfaces of ZnOcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Stabilization Principles for Polar Surfaces of ZnO
Abstract
ZnO is a wide band-gap metal oxide with a very interesting combination of semiconducting, transparent optical and catalytic properties. Recently, an amplified interest in ZnO has appeared due to the impressive progress made in nanofabrication of tailored ZnO nanostructures and functional surfaces. However, the fundamental principles governing the structure of even the clean low-index ZnO surfaces have not been adequately explained. From an interplay of high-resolution Scanning Probe Microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy experiments and Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, we identify here a group of hitherto unresolved surface structures which stabilize the clean polar O-terminated ZnO(000-1) surface. The honeycomb structures are truly remarkable since their existence deviates from expectations using a conventional electrostatic model which applies to the opposite Zn-terminated (0001) surface. As a common principle, the differences for the clean polar ZnO surfaces are explained by a higher bonding flexibility of the exposed three-fold coordinated surface Zn atoms as compared to O atoms.