People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Serre, Christian
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (26/26 displayed)
- 2024A Novel Ti12-based Metal-Organic Framework for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution
- 2024Ultrasmall Functionalized UiO-66 Nanoparticle/Polymer Pebax 1657 Thin-Film Nanocomposite Membranes for Optimal CO 2 Separationcitations
- 2023A robust ultra-microporous cationic aluminum-based metal-organic framework with a flexible tetra-carboxylate linkercitations
- 2023A Robust Ultra-microporous Cationic Aluminiumbased Metal-Organic Framework with a Flexible Tetra-carboxylate Linkercitations
- 2022In Situ Synthesis of a Mesoporous MIL-100(Fe) Bacteria Exoskeletoncitations
- 2022How reproducible are surface areas calculated from the BET equation?citations
- 2022How reproducible are surface areas calculated from the BET equation?citations
- 2022How Reproducible are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation?citations
- 2022How Reproducible are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation?citations
- 2022How Reproducible are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation?citations
- 2021Amine‐functionalized metal–organic frameworks/epoxy nanocomposites: Structure‐properties relationshipscitations
- 2021How Reproducible Are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation?citations
- 2020Methanol and humidity capacitive sensors based on thin films of MOF nanoparticlescitations
- 2018A phase transformable ultrastable titanium-carboxylate framework for photoconductioncitations
- 2017Mechanical properties of a gallium fumarate metal–organic framework : a joint experimental-modelling explorationcitations
- 2017Revisiting the Aluminum Trimesate-based MOF (MIL-96): from Structure Determination to the Processing of Mixed Matrix Membranes for CO2 Capture.citations
- 2017Design of salt-metal organic framework composites for seasonal heat storage applicationscitations
- 2016Design of Laccase–Metal Organic Framework-Based Bioelectrodes for Biocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction.citations
- 2016Investigating the Case of Titanium(IV) Carboxyphenolate Photoactive Coordination Polymerscitations
- 2015Structural Origin of Unusual CO 2 Adsorption Behavior of a Small-Pore Aluminum Bisphosphonate MOFcitations
- 2013A biocompatible calcium bisphosphonate coordination polymer: towards a metal-linker synergistic therapeutic effect?citations
- 2011Synthesis and characterization of a series of porous lanthanide tricarboxylates
- 2007Mixed-Valence Li/Fe-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks with Both Reversible Redox and Sorption Propertiescitations
- 2006Synthesis of MIL-102, a chromium carboxylate metal-organic framework, with gas sorption analysiscitations
- 2006A new isoreticular class of metal-organic-frameworks with the MIL-88 topology
- 2006An EXAFS study of the formation of a nanoporous metal-organic framework: evidence for the retention of secondary building units during synthesis
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Synthesis of MIL-102, a chromium carboxylate metal-organic framework, with gas sorption analysis
Abstract
<p>A new three-dimensional chromium(III) naphthalene tetracarboxylate, Cr <sup>III</sup> <sub>3</sub>O(H <sub>2</sub>O) <sub>2</sub>F{C <sub>10</sub>H <sub>4</sub>-(CO <sub>2</sub>) <sub>4</sub>} <sub>1.5</sub>·6H <sub>2</sub>O (MIL-102), has been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions from an aqueous mixture of Cr(NO <sub>3</sub>) <sub>3</sub>·9H <sub>2</sub>O, naphthalene-1,4,5,8-tetracarboxylic acid, and HF. Its structure, solved ab initio from X-ray powder diffraction data, is built up from the connection of trimers of trivalent chromium octahedra and tetracarboxylate moieties. This creates a three-dimensional structure with an array of small one-dimensional channels filled with free water molecules, which interact through hydrogen bonds with terminal water molecules and oxygen atoms from the carboxylates. Thermogravimetric analysis and X-ray thermodiffractometry indicate that MIL-102 is stable up to ∼300°C and shows zeolitic behavior. Due to topological frustration effects, MIL-102 remains paramagnetic down to 5 K. Finally, MIL-102 exhibits a hydrogen storage capacity of ∼1.0 wt % at 77 K when loaded at 3.5 MPa (35 bar). The hydrogen uptake is discussed in relation with the structural characteristics and the molecular simulation results. The adsorption behavior of MIL-102 at 304 K resembles that of small-pore zeolites, such as silicalite. Indeed, the isotherms of CO <sub>2</sub>, CH <sub>4</sub>, and N <sub>2</sub> show a maximum uptake at 0.5 MPa, with no further significant adsorption up to 3 MPa. Crystal data for MIL-102: hexagonal space group P6 (No. 169), a = 12.632(1) Å, c = 9.622(1) Å.</p>