Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sanakis, Y.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 53

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2000Evidence for antisymmetric exchange in cuboidal [3Fe-4S]+ clusters53citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Munck, E.
1 / 1 shared
Papaefthymiou, V.
1 / 1 shared
Moura, I.
1 / 7 shared
Macedo, Anjos
1 / 1 shared
Moura, José J. G.
1 / 14 shared
Chart of publication period
2000

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Munck, E.
  • Papaefthymiou, V.
  • Moura, I.
  • Macedo, Anjos
  • Moura, José J. G.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evidence for antisymmetric exchange in cuboidal [3Fe-4S]+ clusters

  • Munck, E.
  • Papaefthymiou, V.
  • Moura, I.
  • Macedo, Anjos
  • Sanakis, Y.
  • Moura, José J. G.
Abstract

<p>Iron-sulfur clusters with [3Fe-4S] cores are widely distributed in biological systems. In the oxidized state, designated [3Fe-4S]<sup>+</sup>, these electron-transfer agents have an electronic ground state with S = 1/2 , and they exhibit EPR signals centered at g = 2.01. It has been established by Mossbauer spectroscopy that the three iron sites of the cluster are high-spin Fe<sup>3+</sup>, and the general properties of the S = 1/2 ground state have been described with the exchange Hamiltonian H(exch) = J<sub>12</sub>S<sub>1</sub>·S<sub>2</sub> + J<sub>23</sub>S<sub>2</sub>·S<sub>3</sub> + J<sub>13</sub>S<sub>1</sub>·S<sub>3</sub>. Some [3Fe-4S]<sup>+</sup> clusters (type 1) have their g-values confined to the range between g = 2.03 and 2.00 while others (type 2) exhibit a continuous distribution of g-values down to g ≃ 1.85. Despite considerable efforts in various laboratories no model has emerged that explains the g-values of type 2 clusters. The 4.2 K spectra of all [3Fe-4S]<sup>+</sup> clusters have broad features which have been simulated in the past by using <sup>57</sup>Fe magnetic hyperfine tensors war anisotropies that are unusually large for high-spin ferric sites. It is proposed here that antisymmetric exchange, H(AS) = d·(S<sub>1</sub> x S<sub>2</sub> + S<sub>2</sub> x S<sub>3</sub> + S<sub>3</sub> x S<sub>1</sub>), is the cause of the g-value shifts in type 2 clusters. We have been able to fit the EPR and Mossbauer spectra of the 3Fe clusters of beef heart aconitase and Desulfovibrio gigas ferredoxin II by using antisymmetric exchange in combination with distributed exchange coupling constants J<sub>12</sub>, J<sub>13</sub>, and J<sub>23</sub> (J-strain). While antisymmetric exchange is negligible for aconitase (which has a type 1 cluster), fits of the ferredoxin II spectra require |d| ≃ 0.4 cm<sup>-1</sup>. Our studies show that the data of both proteins can be fit using the same isotropic <sup>57</sup>Fe magnetic hyperfine coupling constant for the three cluster sites, namely a = -18.0 MHz for aconitase and a = -18.5 MHz for the D. gigas ferredoxin. The effects of antisymmetric exchange and J-strain on the Mossbauer and EPR spectra are discussed.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • cluster
  • iron
  • electron spin resonance spectroscopy
  • isotropic