| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Suleiman, Osama
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (1/1 displayed)
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
An investigation into the dehydration behavior of paroxetine HCl form i using a combination of thermal and diffraction methods: The identification and characterization of a new anhydrous form
Abstract
Paroxetine HCl can exist as a non-stoichiometric hydrate (Form II) or as a stoichiometric hemihydrate (Form I); the latter is considered to be the stable form and its structure is well-known. However, little work has been performed to investigate its dehydration behavior, hence the generation of the anhydrous form via dehydration of Form I was investigated. A combination of thermal (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)) and diffraction (variable temperature X-ray powder diffraction (VT-XRPD)) techniques were used. Dehydrated Form I was prepared using ultra-dry conditions and the resulting product compared to dehydrated Form II. DSC indicated that the two dehydrated forms of Form I and II had distinct melting points. TGA experiments allowed the calculation of the activation energy for the dehydration of Form I, which varies between 86?114 kJ/mol. Pawley refinement of the VT-XRPD data suggested that Form I dehydrates to an isostructural anhydrate, since the unit cell parameters of this new form were very similar to those of Form I with only a smaller volume as consequence of dehydration. Comparison with dehydrated Form II indicated that these two forms represent different crystal entities, hence a new anhydrous form of paroxetine HCl has been identified. Paroxetine HCl can exist as a non-stoichiometric hydrate (Form II) or as a stoichiometric hemihydrate (Form I); the latter is considered to be the stable form and its structure is well-known. However, little work has been performed to investigate its dehydration behavior, hence the generation of the anhydrous form via dehydration of Form I was investigated. A combination of thermal (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)) and diffraction (variable temperature X-ray powder diffraction (VT-XRPD)) techniques were used. Dehydrated Form I was prepared using ultra-dry conditions and the resulting product compared to dehydrated Form II. DSC indicated that the two dehydrated forms of Form I and II had distinct melting points. TGA experiments allowed the calculation of the activation energy for the dehydration of Form I, which varies between 86?114 kJ/mol. Pawley refinement of the VT-XRPD data suggested that Form I dehydrates to an isostructural anhydrate, since the unit cell parameters of this new form were very similar to those of Form I with only a smaller volume as consequence of dehydration. Comparison with dehydrated Form II indicated that these two forms represent different crystal entities, hence a new anhydrous form of paroxetine HCl has been identified.