Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Yang, Joel K. W.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 11

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 20223D printing mesoscale optical components with a low-cost resin printer integrated with a fiber-optic taper11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wang, Hongtao
1 / 1 shared
Simpson, Robert E.
1 / 6 shared
Parvathi Nair, S.
1 / 1 shared
Rezaei, Soroosh Daqiqeh
1 / 1 shared
Ruan, Qifeng
1 / 1 shared
Trisno, Jonathan
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wang, Hongtao
  • Simpson, Robert E.
  • Parvathi Nair, S.
  • Rezaei, Soroosh Daqiqeh
  • Ruan, Qifeng
  • Trisno, Jonathan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

3D printing mesoscale optical components with a low-cost resin printer integrated with a fiber-optic taper

  • Wang, Hongtao
  • Simpson, Robert E.
  • Parvathi Nair, S.
  • Rezaei, Soroosh Daqiqeh
  • Ruan, Qifeng
  • Trisno, Jonathan
  • Yang, Joel K. W.
Abstract

<p>Design flexibility, ease of use, and reduced wastage have made additive manufacturing well suited for producing functional prints in many fields including optics. As surface quality is compromised in many cases, postprocessing or better fabrication techniques are required. Advanced fabrication techniques such as two-photon polymerization lithography (TPL) have enabled nano- and microscale fabrications with high surface quality, while postprocessing improves the surface quality of macroscale structures. However, fabricating mesoscale optical components is still challenging as these structures require a lot of time to fabricate with TPL and postprocessing capabilities are limited at these dimensions. Low-cost resin printers are now equipped with 4K resolution screens claiming pixel sizes of ∼35 μm. Still, improvements in print resolution and surface smoothness could be obtained with a simple modification to the setup. Here, we study the impact of introducing a fiber-optic taper to demagnify the images from the screen of a low-cost hobbyist grade resin printer for mesoscale (100 μm to 5 mm) fabrication, achieving a resolution of ∼15 μm half-pitch. We compared normal and modified printing techniques, with gains in resolution used to fabricate a working Fresnel lens.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • resin
  • additive manufacturing
  • lithography