People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Daasbjerg, Kim
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (21/21 displayed)
- 2023Interfacial Engineering of PVDF-TrFE toward Higher Piezoelectric, Ferroelectric, and Dielectric Performance for Sensing and Energy Harvesting Applicationscitations
- 2023Interfacial Engineering of PVDF-TrFE toward Higher Piezoelectric, Ferroelectric, and Dielectric Performance for Sensing and Energy Harvesting Applicationscitations
- 2023Steering carbon dioxide reduction toward C–C coupling using copper electrodes modified with porous molecular filmscitations
- 2023Interfacial Engineering of PVDF‐TrFE toward Higher Piezoelectric, Ferroelectric, and Dielectric Performance for Sensing and Energy Harvesting Applicationscitations
- 2022Can the CO 2 Reduction Reaction Be Improved on Cu:Selectivity and Intrinsic Activity of Functionalized Cu Surfacescitations
- 2022Can the CO2Reduction Reaction Be Improved on Cucitations
- 2020Restructuring Metal–Organic Frameworks to Nanoscale Bismuth Electrocatalysts for Highly Active and Selective CO 2 Reduction to Formatecitations
- 2020Achieving Near-Unity CO Selectivity for CO 2 Electroreduction on an Iron-Decorated Carbon Materialcitations
- 2020Restructuring Metal–Organic Frameworks to Nanoscale Bismuth Electrocatalysts for Highly Active and Selective CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction to Formatecitations
- 2020Stimuli-responsive degrafting of polymer brushes via addressable catecholato-metal attachmentscitations
- 2020Stimuli-responsive degrafting of polymer brushes via addressable catecholato-metal attachmentscitations
- 2020Non-enzymatic Electroanalytical Sensing of Glucose Based on Nano Nickel-Coordination Polymers-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrodecitations
- 2020Restructuring Metal–Organic Frameworks to Nanoscale Bismuth Electrocatalysts for Highly Active and Selective $CO_{2}$ Reduction to Formatecitations
- 2020Facile Access to Disulfide/Thiol Containing Poly(glycidyl methacrylate) Brushes as Potential Rubber Adhesive Layerscitations
- 2020Facile Access to Disulfide/Thiol Containing Poly(glycidyl methacrylate) Brushes as Potential Rubber Adhesive Layerscitations
- 2018Facile Synthesis of Iron- and Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon for Selective CO 2 Electroreductioncitations
- 2018Efficient bonding of ethylene-propylene-diene M-class rubber to stainless steel using polymer brushes as a nanoscale adhesivecitations
- 2017Efficient Graphene Production by Combined Bipolar Electrochemical Intercalation and High-Shear Exfoliationcitations
- 2016Hydrophilic Polymer Brush Layers on Stainless Steel Using Multilayered ATRP Initiator Layercitations
- 2016Electrochemical procedure for constructing poly(phenylene sulfide) brushes on glassy carbon and stainless steelcitations
- 2014Durability of PEEK adhesive to stainless steel modified with aryldiazonium saltscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Can the CO2Reduction Reaction Be Improved on Cu
Abstract
<p>Cu is currently the most effective monometallic catalyst for producing valuable multicarbon-based (C<sub>2+</sub>) products, such as ethylene and ethanol, from the CO<sub>2</sub>reduction reaction (CO<sub>2</sub>RR). One approach to optimize the activity and selectivity of the metal Cu catalyst is to functionalize the Cu electrode with a molecular modifier. We investigate from a data standpoint whether any reported functionalized Cu catalyst improves the intrinsic activity and/or multicarbon product selectivity compared to the performance of bare Cu foil and the best single crystal Cu facets. Our analysis shows that the reported increases in activity are due to increased surface roughness and disappear once normalized with respect to electrochemical surface area. The intrinsic activity generally falls below that of the bare Cu foil reference, both for total and product-specific current, which we attribute to nonselective blocking of active sites by the modifier on the surface. Instead, an analysis of various polymer diffusion coefficients indicates that the modifier allows for easier diffusion of CO<sub>2</sub>compared to H<sub>2</sub>O to the surface, leading to greater selectivity for CO<sub>2</sub>RR and C<sub>2+</sub>products. As such, our analysis finds no catalyst for CO<sub>2</sub>RR that intrinsically outperforms bare Cu.</p>