Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Schmidt-Bleek, K.

  • Google
  • 6
  • 40
  • 213

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Titanium vs PEO Surface-Modified Magnesium Plate Fixation in a Mandible Bone Healing Model in Sheep.1citations
  • 2024Titanium versus plasma electrolytic oxidation surface-modified magnesium miniplates in a forehead secondary fracture healing model in sheep.2citations
  • 2022Long-term in vivo observations show biocompatibility and performance of ZX00 magnesium screws surface-modified by plasma-electrolytic oxidation in Göttingen miniature pigs.30citations
  • 2021Improved in vivo osseointegration and degradation behavior of PEO surface-modified WE43 magnesium plates and screws after 6 and 12 months.62citations
  • 2019Collagen I-based scaffolds negatively impact fracture healing in a mouse-osteotomy-model although used routinely in research and clinical application.26citations
  • 2010Designing biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Why aim for a copy of mature tissue properties if nature uses a different approach?92citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Fischer, H.
4 / 27 shared
Gn, Duda
3 / 11 shared
Herzog, P.
2 / 3 shared
Turostowski, M.
2 / 2 shared
Rendenbach, C.
4 / 8 shared
Heiland, Max
4 / 10 shared
Prates Soares, A.
1 / 1 shared
Ellinghaus, A.
2 / 2 shared
Ap, Soares
2 / 2 shared
Leber, C.
1 / 1 shared
Duda, G.
3 / 9 shared
Kröger, N.
2 / 2 shared
Van Gaalen, K.
1 / 1 shared
Kreiker, H.
2 / 2 shared
Jung, O.
2 / 2 shared
Hanken, H.
2 / 2 shared
Kopp, A.
2 / 4 shared
Smeets, R.
2 / 3 shared
Beck-Broichsitter, B.
1 / 1 shared
Thiele, M.
1 / 9 shared
Stumpp, S.
1 / 3 shared
Ae, Hauser
1 / 1 shared
Hoff, P.
1 / 1 shared
Pfeiffenberger, M.
1 / 1 shared
Damerau, A.
1 / 1 shared
Durst, M.
1 / 1 shared
Mc, Weber
1 / 1 shared
Kirchner, M.
1 / 1 shared
Stefanowski, J.
1 / 1 shared
Buttgereit, F.
1 / 1 shared
Gaber, T.
1 / 2 shared
Lang, A.
1 / 4 shared
Strube, P.
1 / 3 shared
Mehta, M.
1 / 3 shared
Cipitria, A.
1 / 8 shared
Wildemann, B.
1 / 3 shared
Willie, B. M.
1 / 2 shared
Fratzl, Prof. Dr. Dr. H. C. Peter
1 / 569 shared
Petersen, A.
1 / 3 shared
Lienau, J.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2021
2019
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Fischer, H.
  • Gn, Duda
  • Herzog, P.
  • Turostowski, M.
  • Rendenbach, C.
  • Heiland, Max
  • Prates Soares, A.
  • Ellinghaus, A.
  • Ap, Soares
  • Leber, C.
  • Duda, G.
  • Kröger, N.
  • Van Gaalen, K.
  • Kreiker, H.
  • Jung, O.
  • Hanken, H.
  • Kopp, A.
  • Smeets, R.
  • Beck-Broichsitter, B.
  • Thiele, M.
  • Stumpp, S.
  • Ae, Hauser
  • Hoff, P.
  • Pfeiffenberger, M.
  • Damerau, A.
  • Durst, M.
  • Mc, Weber
  • Kirchner, M.
  • Stefanowski, J.
  • Buttgereit, F.
  • Gaber, T.
  • Lang, A.
  • Strube, P.
  • Mehta, M.
  • Cipitria, A.
  • Wildemann, B.
  • Willie, B. M.
  • Fratzl, Prof. Dr. Dr. H. C. Peter
  • Petersen, A.
  • Lienau, J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Titanium vs PEO Surface-Modified Magnesium Plate Fixation in a Mandible Bone Healing Model in Sheep.

  • Schmidt-Bleek, K.
  • Fischer, H.
  • Gn, Duda
  • Herzog, P.
  • Turostowski, M.
  • Rendenbach, C.
  • Heiland, Max
  • Prates Soares, A.
  • Ellinghaus, A.
Abstract

Titanium plates are the current gold standard for fracture fixation of the mandible. Magnesium alloys such as WE43 are suitable biodegradable alternatives due to their high biocompatibility and elasticity modulus close to those of cortical bone. By surface modification, the reagibility of magnesium and thus hydrogen gas accumulation per time are further reduced, bringing plate fixation with magnesium closer to clinical application. This study aimed to compare bone healing in a monocortical mandibular fracture model in sheep with a human-standard size, magnesium-based, plasma electrolytic-oxidation (PEO) surface modified miniplate fixation system following 4 and 12 weeks. Bone healing was analyzed using micro-computed tomography and histological analysis with Movat's pentachrome and Giemsa staining. For evaluation of the tissue's osteogenic activity, polychrome fluorescent labeling was performed, and vascularization was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining for alpha-smooth muscle actin. Bone density and bone mineralization did not differ significantly between titanium and magnesium (BV/TV: T1: 8.74 ± 2.30%, M1: 6.83 ± 2.89%, p = 0.589 and T2: 71.99 ± 3.13%, M2: 68.58 ± 3.74%, p = 0.394; MinB: T1: 26.16 ± 9.21%, M1: 22.15 ± 7.99%, p = 0.818 and T2: 77.56 ± 3.61%, M2: 79.06 ± 4.46%, p = 0.699). After 12 weeks, minor differences were observed regarding bone microstructure, osteogenic activity, and vascularization. There was significance with regard to bone microstructure (TrTh: T2: 0.08 ± 0.01 mm, M2: 0.06 ± 0.01 mm; p = 0.041). Nevertheless, these differences did not interfere with bone healing. In this study, adequate bone healing was observed in both groups. Only after 12 weeks were some differences detected with larger trabecular spacing and more vessel density in magnesium vs titanium plates. However, a longer observational time with full resorption of the implants should be targeted in future investigations.

Topics
  • density
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • Magnesium
  • magnesium alloy
  • Magnesium
  • tomography
  • gold
  • Hydrogen
  • elasticity
  • titanium
  • biocompatibility