People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Castilho, Miguel
Eindhoven University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (19/19 displayed)
- 2024Covalent Grafting of Functionalized MEW Fibers to Silk Fibroin Hydrogels to Obtain Reinforced Tissue Engineered Constructscitations
- 2024Covalent Grafting of Functionalized MEW Fibers to Silk Fibroin Hydrogels to Obtain Reinforced Tissue Engineered Constructscitations
- 20243D Printed Magneto-Active Microfiber Scaffolds for Remote Stimulation and Guided Organization of 3D In Vitro Skeletal Muscle Modelscitations
- 20233D printed magneto-active microfiber scaffolds for remote stimulation of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle modelscitations
- 20233D Printed Magneto‐Active Microfiber Scaffolds for Remote Stimulation and Guided Organization of 3D In Vitro Skeletal Muscle Modelscitations
- 20233D printed and punched porous surfaces of a non-resorbable, biphasic implant for the repair of osteochondral lesions improves repair tissue adherence and ingrowth
- 2023Multi-leveled Nanosilicate Implants Can Facilitate Near-Perfect Bone Healingcitations
- 2023Composite Graded Melt Electrowritten Scaffolds for Regeneration of the Periodontal Ligament-to-Bone Interfacecitations
- 2021Combinatorial fluorapatite-based scaffolds substituted with strontium, magnesium and silicon ions for mending bone defectscitations
- 2020Anisotropic hygro-expansion in hydrogel fibers owing to uniting 3D electrowriting and supramolecular polymer assemblycitations
- 2020Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfacescitations
- 2020Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfacescitations
- 2020Long-Term in Vivo Performance of Low-Temperature 3D-Printed Bioceramics in an Equine Modelcitations
- 2020Stable and Antibacterial Magnesium-Graphene Nanocomposite-Based Implants for Bone Repaircitations
- 2020Stable and Antibacterial Magnesium-Graphene Nanocomposite-Based Implants for Bone Repaircitations
- 2019Bi-layered micro-fibre reinforced hydrogels for articular cartilage regenerationcitations
- 2018Out-of-plane 3D-printed microfibers improve the shear properties of hydrogel compositescitations
- 2018Out-of-Plane 3D-Printed Microfibers Improve the Shear Properties of Hydrogel Compositescitations
- 2017Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprintingcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Multi-leveled Nanosilicate Implants Can Facilitate Near-Perfect Bone Healing
Abstract
<p>Several studies have shown that nanosilicate-reinforced scaffolds are suitable for bone regeneration. However, hydrogels are inherently too soft for load-bearing bone defects of critical sizes, and hard scaffolds typically do not provide a suitable three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment for cells to thrive, grow, and differentiate naturally. In this study, we bypass these long-standing challenges by fabricating a cell-free multi-level implant consisting of a porous and hard bone-like framework capable of providing load-bearing support and a softer native-like phase that has been reinforced with nanosilicates. The system was tested with rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and as a cell-free system in a critical-sized rat bone defect. Overall, our combinatorial and multi-level implant design displayed remarkable osteoconductivity in vitro without differentiation factors, expressing significant levels of osteogenic markers compared to unmodified groups. Moreover, after 8 weeks of implantation, histological and immunohistochemical assays indicated that the cell-free scaffolds enhanced bone repair up to approximately 84% following a near-complete defect healing. Overall, our results suggest that the proposed nanosilicate bioceramic implant could herald a new age in the field of orthopedics.</p>