Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Foster, Andrew Bryan

  • Google
  • 3
  • 26
  • 88

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2022Thin film nanocomposite membranes of PIM-1 and graphene oxide/ZIF-8 nanohybrids for organophilic pervaporation17citations
  • 2021PIM-1/Holey Graphene Oxide Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation: Unveiling the Role of Holes37citations
  • 2020Using soft polymer template engineering of mesoporous TiO2 scaffolds to increase perovskite grain size and solar cell efficiency34citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Fan, Xiaolei
1 / 3 shared
Mohsenpour, Sajjad
1 / 5 shared
Qiu, Boya
1 / 4 shared
Budd, Peter M.
2 / 22 shared
Gorgojo, Patricia
2 / 26 shared
Alberto, Monica
1 / 10 shared
Holmes, Stuart
1 / 12 shared
Ding, Shengzhe
1 / 3 shared
Xu, Shaojun
1 / 9 shared
Tamaddondar, Marzieh
1 / 1 shared
Luque-Alled, Jose Miguel
1 / 9 shared
Hodson, Nigel
1 / 7 shared
Wu, Shanglin
1 / 1 shared
Alkaltham, Abdulaziz
1 / 1 shared
Mokhtar, Muhamad Zulhasif
1 / 6 shared
Watson, Trystan M.
1 / 4 shared
Lian, Qing
1 / 2 shared
Lu, Dongdong
1 / 1 shared
Zhu, Mingning
1 / 2 shared
Jacobs, Janet
1 / 5 shared
Liu, Chen
1 / 9 shared
Spencer, Ben Felix
1 / 14 shared
Saunders, Brian R.
1 / 35 shared
Alkhudhari, Osama
1 / 2 shared
Smith, Benjamin
1 / 2 shared
Thomas, Andrew G.
1 / 28 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Fan, Xiaolei
  • Mohsenpour, Sajjad
  • Qiu, Boya
  • Budd, Peter M.
  • Gorgojo, Patricia
  • Alberto, Monica
  • Holmes, Stuart
  • Ding, Shengzhe
  • Xu, Shaojun
  • Tamaddondar, Marzieh
  • Luque-Alled, Jose Miguel
  • Hodson, Nigel
  • Wu, Shanglin
  • Alkaltham, Abdulaziz
  • Mokhtar, Muhamad Zulhasif
  • Watson, Trystan M.
  • Lian, Qing
  • Lu, Dongdong
  • Zhu, Mingning
  • Jacobs, Janet
  • Liu, Chen
  • Spencer, Ben Felix
  • Saunders, Brian R.
  • Alkhudhari, Osama
  • Smith, Benjamin
  • Thomas, Andrew G.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Using soft polymer template engineering of mesoporous TiO2 scaffolds to increase perovskite grain size and solar cell efficiency

  • Hodson, Nigel
  • Wu, Shanglin
  • Alkaltham, Abdulaziz
  • Mokhtar, Muhamad Zulhasif
  • Watson, Trystan M.
  • Lian, Qing
  • Lu, Dongdong
  • Zhu, Mingning
  • Jacobs, Janet
  • Liu, Chen
  • Spencer, Ben Felix
  • Saunders, Brian R.
  • Foster, Andrew Bryan
  • Alkhudhari, Osama
  • Smith, Benjamin
  • Thomas, Andrew G.
Abstract

The mesoporous (meso)-TiO2 layer is a key component of high-efficiency perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Herein, pore size controllable meso-TiO2 layers are prepared using spin coating of commercial TiO2 nanoparticle (NP) paste with added soft polymer templates (SPT) followed by removal of the SPT at 500 °C. The SPTs consist of swollen crosslinked polymer colloids (microgels, MGs) or a commercial linear polymer (denoted as LIN). The MGs and LIN were comprised of the same polymer, which was poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAm). Large (L-MG) and small (S-MG) MG SPTs were employed to study the effect of the template size. The SPT approach enabled pore size engineering in one deposition step. The SPT/TiO2 nanoparticle films had pore sizes > 100 nm, whereas the average pore size was 37 nm for the control meso-TiO2 scaffold. The largest pore sizes were obtained using L-MG. SPT engineering increased the perovskite grain size in the same order as the SPT sizes: LIN <S-MG <L-MG and these grain sizes were larger than those obtained using the control. The power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of the SPT/TiO2 devices were ∼20% higher than that for the control meso-TiO2 device and the PCE of the champion S-MG device was 18.8%. The PCE improvement is due to the increased grain size and more effective light harvesting of the SPT devices. The increased grain size was also responsible for the improved stability of the SPT/TiO2 devices. The SPT method used here is simple, scalable, and versatile and should also apply to other PSCs.

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • Deposition
  • perovskite
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • pore
  • polymer
  • grain
  • grain size
  • porosity
  • spin coating